GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in @tinacms/graphql. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
@tinacms/graphql's `FilesystemBridge` Path Validation Can Be Bypassed via Symlinks or Junctions
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.
@tinacms/graphqlnpmDescription
Summary
@tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge:
path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, filepath))startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)
That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered "inside" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it.
As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root.
Details
The current bridge validation is:
function assertWithinBase(filepath: string, baseDir: string): string {
const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir);
const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, filepath));
if (
resolved !== resolvedBase &&
!resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)
) {
throw new Error(
`Path traversal detected: "${filepath}" escapes the base directory`
);
}
return resolved;
}
But the bridge then performs real filesystem I/O on the resulting path:
public async get(filepath: string) {
const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, this.outputPath);
return (await fs.readFile(resolved)).toString();
}
public async put(filepath: string, data: string, basePathOverride?: string) {
const basePath = basePathOverride || this.outputPath;
const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, basePath);
await fs.outputFile(resolved, data);
}
public async delete(filepath: string) {
const resolved = assertWithinBase(filepath, this.outputPath);
await fs.remove(resolved);
}
This is a classic realpath gap:
- validation checks the lexical path string
- the filesystem follows the link target during I/O
- the actual target can be outside the intended root
This is reachable from Tina's GraphQL/local database flow. The resolver builds a validated path from user-controlled relativePath, but that validation is also string-based:
const realPath = path.join(collection.path, relativePath);
this.validatePath(realPath, collection, relativePath);
Database write and delete operations then call the bridge:
await this.bridge.put(normalizedPath, stringifiedFile);
...
await this.bridge.delete(normalizedPath);
Local Reproduction
This was verified llocally with a real junction on Windows, which exercises the same failure mode as a symlink on Unix-like systems.
Test layout:
- content root:
D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4 - allowed collection path:
content/posts - junction inside collection:
content/posts/pivot -> D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\outside - file outside content root:
outside\secret.txt
Tina's current path-validation logic was applied and used to perform bridge-style read/write operations through the junction.
Observed result:
{
"graphqlBridge": {
"collectionPath": "content/posts",
"requestedRelativePath": "pivot/owned.md",
"validatedRealPath": "content\\posts\\pivot\\owned.md",
"bridgeResolvedPath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\content\\posts\\pivot\\owned.md",
"bridgeRead": "TOP_SECRET_FROM_OUTSIDE\\r\\n",
"outsideGraphqlWriteExists": true,
"outsideGraphqlWriteContents": "GRAPHQL_ESCAPE"
}
}
That is the critical point:
- the path was accepted as inside
content/posts - the bridge read
outside\secret.txt - the bridge wrote
outside\owned.md
So the current containment check does not actually constrain filesystem access to the configured content root once a link exists inside that tree.
Impact
- Arbitrary file read/write outside the configured content root
- Potential delete outside the configured content root via the same
assertWithinBase()gap indelete() - Breaks the assumptions of the recent path-traversal fixes because only lexical traversal is blocked
- Practical attack chains where the content tree contains a committed symlink/junction, or an attacker can cause one to exist before issuing GraphQL/content operations
The exact network exploitability depends on how the application exposes Tina's GraphQL/content operations, but the underlying bridge bug is real and independently security-relevant.
Recommended Fix
The containment check needs to compare canonical filesystem paths, not just string-normalized paths.
For example:
- resolve the base with
fs.realpath() - resolve the candidate path's parent with
fs.realpath() - reject any request whose real target path escapes the real base
- for write operations, carefully canonicalize the nearest existing parent directory before creating the final file
In short: use realpath-aware containment checks for every filesystem sink, not path.resolve(...).startsWith(...) alone.
Resources
packages/@tinacms/graphql/src/database/bridge/filesystem.tspackages/@tinacms/graphql/src/database/index.tspackages/@tinacms/graphql/src/resolver/index.ts
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @tinacms/graphql | all versions | 2.2.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @tinacms/graphql. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update @tinacms/graphql to 2.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.