GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627
HIGHGHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in praisonai-platform. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can delete the entire workspace via DELETE /workspaces/{id}
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 366,298 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
praisonai-platformReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Type: Authorization bypass enabling destructive action. The DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id} endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member"). Any member of the workspace can issue a single DELETE to wipe the entire workspace, including every project, issue, comment, agent, label, and member record (cascading via the foreign-key relationships). There is no owner-role gate, no confirmation token, no soft-delete window, no recovery path.
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 77-86; services/workspace_service.py's delete() method.
Root cause: the route uses Depends(require_workspace_member) which defaults to min_role="member" and is never overridden. The service method WorkspaceService.delete(workspace_id) performs the destructive operation without any caller-permission verification. The role hierarchy (MemberService.has_role, member_service.py:80-96) is implemented but unused for this endpoint.
Affected Code
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 77-86.
@router.delete("/{workspace_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
async def delete_workspace(
workspace_id: str,
user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # <-- BUG: defaults to min_role="member"
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)
deleted = await ws_svc.delete(workspace_id) # <-- destructive, no role check
if not deleted:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Workspace not found")
Why it's wrong: workspace deletion is the most destructive single action in this product — it wipes every member, project, issue, comment, agent, and label belonging to the tenant. The standard convention is to gate this on owner role, ideally with a confirmation parameter (typed workspace name) and a recovery window. This endpoint does none of that. The require_workspace_member(min_role) parameter exists precisely for this kind of tightening but is never invoked with anything other than the default.
Exploit Chain
- Attacker is a member of workspace
W(joined via invite, signup default, or any other route into membership). State: attacker holds JWT withMember(workspace_id=W, user_id=attacker, role="member"). - Attacker sends
DELETE /workspaces/WwithAuthorization: Bearer <attacker_jwt>. State: control flow entersdelete_workspace. require_workspace_member(W, attacker)passes (attacker is a member, default min_role="member" satisfied).WorkspaceService.delete(W)removes the workspace row; SQLAlchemy cascade rules drop every related row (members, projects, issues, comments, agents, labels). State: workspaceWno longer exists.- Final state: a low-privilege member has wiped the workspace. The legitimate owner has no recovery: no soft-delete, no audit-trail event for the deletion (the
Activitylog row would have been deleted too as part of the cascade). The same primitive at scale (script that DELETEs every workspace_id the attacker can enumerate) becomes a multi-tenant griefing tool.
Security Impact
Severity: sec-high. CVSS 8.1: network attack, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope unchanged, no confidentiality (just destruction), high integrity (every workspace child row wiped), high availability (workspace gone for legitimate owner).
Attacker capability: with one workspace-member token plus one DELETE request, the attacker irreversibly deletes the workspace and every child resource. The deletion is silent and immediate.
Preconditions: praisonai-platform is deployed multi-tenant; the attacker has any membership token in the target workspace.
Differential: source-inspection-verified. The asymmetry between require_workspace_member's clearly-tunable min_role parameter and this endpoint's use of the default value confirms the gap. With the suggested fix below, member-tier tokens fail the gate at the dependency, the destructive action never reaches the service layer, and the endpoint returns 403 instead of 204.
Suggested Fix
--- a/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py
+++ b/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py
@@ -75,11 +75,15 @@
+def _require_workspace_owner(workspace_id: str, user, session):
+ return require_workspace_member(workspace_id, user, session, min_role="owner")
+
@router.delete("/{workspace_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
async def delete_workspace(
workspace_id: str,
- user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
+ user: AuthIdentity = Depends(_require_workspace_owner),
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)
deleted = await ws_svc.delete(workspace_id)
if not deleted:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Workspace not found")
Defence-in-depth: require a typed-confirmation parameter (e.g. body {"confirm_name": "<workspace_name>"}) and implement a 30-day soft-delete with restore. The four companion workspace-mutation endpoints (update_workspace, add_member, update_member_role, remove_member) exhibit the same default-min-role gap and are filed as their own advisories.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai-platform | all versions | 0.1.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai-platform. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update praisonai-platform to 0.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-g8rr-7rj2-f627 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.