Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x

MEDIUM

GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) remote code execution vulnerability in bleach. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Bleach linkify(parse_email=True) CPU exhaustion via unbounded email regex scanning

Published
Jun 16, 2026
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍bleach

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Bleach 6.3.0 exposes a documented email-linkification path through bleach.linkify(..., parse_email=True). The implementation scans attacker-controlled text with EMAIL_RE.finditer() over the full character token and has no length, timeout, or linear prefilter before applying the dot-atom email regex. A non-email payload around 30 KB causes multi-second CPU consumption per request/call, creating a direct availability risk for applications that enable email linkification on user-submitted text.

Affected Product

  • Package: bleach
  • Ecosystem: pip
  • Affected versions: verified in 6.3.0; exact first affected version not established
  • Patched versions: none known at finalization time
  • Tested version: 6.3.0
  • Audit commit/tag: v6.3.0 / 5546d5dbce60d08ccb99d981778d74044d646d4e
  • PyPI sdist SHA256: 6f3b91b1c0a02bb9a78b5a454c92506aa0fdf197e1d5e114d2e00c6f64306d22

Vulnerability Details

  • CWE: CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity; related availability impact maps to CWE-400
  • Component: bleach/linkifier.py, build_email_re(), LinkifyFilter.handle_email_addresses()
  • Root cause: handle_email_addresses() calls self.email_re.finditer(text) on attacker-controlled text. EMAIL_RE includes a repeated dot-atom local-part pattern, so non-email strings such as repeated a. segments with no @ force repeated long failing scans.
  • Security boundary violated: user-submitted text processed by a documented safe linkification helper should not allow an attacker to impose superlinear CPU cost through non-email text.
  • Direct impact: per-request CPU exhaustion / denial-of-service risk in applications that enable parse_email=True on attacker-controlled text.
  • Chain impact, if any: one proof run observed an unrelated /health request delayed during a concurrent attack request, but this was not reliable across reviewer retests. Treat cross-request service degradation as environment-dependent supporting evidence, not the primary impact.
  • Severity estimate: Medium / availability-only. The feature is opt-in and deployment body limits/timeouts affect practical severity.

Relevant code path:

  • bleach/__init__.py:85-125: public linkify(text, ..., parse_email=False) constructs Linker(..., parse_email=parse_email) and calls linker.linkify(text).
  • bleach/linkifier.py:77-88: EMAIL_RE is compiled from the dot-atom email pattern.
  • bleach/linkifier.py:292-301: handle_email_addresses() applies self.email_re.finditer(text) to each character token.
  • bleach/linkifier.py:620-623: character tokens are routed into email handling only when parse_email is true.
  • docs/goals.rst:30-40: Bleach documents user comments, profile bios, and descriptions as target untrusted text use cases.
  • docs/linkify.rst:300-305: parse_email=True is the documented option for creating mailto: links.

Attack Preconditions

  • The consuming application enables the documented parse_email=True option, for example bleach.linkify(user_text, parse_email=True) or Linker(parse_email=True).linkify(user_text).
  • The attacker can submit text that reaches that linkification path. Authentication depends on the host application; a public comment form would make this unauthenticated, while account-only text fields require user privileges.
  • The application allows roughly 20-30 KB of text to reach Bleach and lacks a strict timeout or input cap before linkification.
  • No custom bounded email_re is supplied.

Reproduction

Minimal API trigger:

import bleach
payload = ("a." * 15000) + "a"
bleach.linkify(payload, parse_email=True)

The saved HTTP proof uses a local harness with POST /preview calling bleach.linkify(request_body, parse_email=True) and a control endpoint using parse_email=False on the same payload. The exploit sends baseline/control/attack requests over HTTP to 127.0.0.1.

Proof Evidence

The proof ran against Bleach 6.3.0 installed from the audited local checkout in an isolated temporary venv. It used Python 3.12.3 on Linux.

Measured HTTP proof results:

  • Payload: ("a." * 15000) + "a" (30001 bytes)
  • Normal baseline /preview mean: 0.001425 seconds
  • Same 30 KB payload with parse_email=False: 0.048349 seconds
  • Attack payload with parse_email=True: 8.719818 seconds
  • Slowdown versus the larger baseline/control mean: 180.35x
  • Requests sent by proof: 20

Evidence files: poc.py poc_results.json exploit_proof.py exploit_results.json

Scope and Limitations

  • This report does not claim XSS, authentication bypass, data disclosure, remote code execution, persistent crash, or persistent service outage.
  • parse_email=True is not the default. The affected path is a documented opt-in feature.
  • The exact first affected version is not established.
  • Practical impact depends on host application input limits, worker model, request timeout policy, and whether untrusted users can submit text to an email-linkification path.
  • A reviewer reproduced the direct CPU cost but did not reproduce the proof harness’s /health delay. The direct impact claim is therefore limited to per-request CPU exhaustion.
  • Bleach is marked deprecated in README.rst, and SECURITY.md has stale supported-version text, but the package still has a 2025 PyPI release and published Mozilla security reporting routes.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbleachall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bleach. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of bleach has shipped for GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Bleach 6.3.0 exposes a documented email-linkification path through `bleach.linkify(..., parse_email=True)`. The implementation scans attacker-controlled text with `EMAIL_RE.finditer()` over the full character token and has no length, timeout, or linear prefilter before applying the dot-atom email regex. A non-email payload around 30 KB causes multi-second CPU consumption per request/call, creating a direct availability risk for applications that enable email linkification on user-submitted text. ## Affected Product - Package: `bleach` - Ecosystem: pip - Affected versions: verified
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.