Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-g6w6-r76c-28j7

HIGH

Incorrect Authorization in NATS nats-server

Also known asBIT-nats-2022-24450CVE-2022-24450GO-2022-0307
Published
Feb 8, 2022
Updated
Aug 21, 2024
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk66th percentile+0.63%
0.03%0.61%1.20%1.78%0.5%1.3%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2🐹github.com/nats-io/nats-streaming-server

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

(This advisory is canonically https://advisories.nats.io/CVE/CVE-2022-24450.txt)

Problem Description

NATS nats-server through 2022-02-04 has Incorrect Access Control, with unchecked ability for clients to authorize into any account, because of a coding error in a long-extant experimental feature.

A client crafting the initial protocol-level handshake could, with valid credentials for any account, specify a target account and switch into it immediately. This includes any other tenant, and includes the System account which controls nats-server core operations.

For deployments not using multi-tenancy through NATS Accounts, there is still a vulnerability: normal users are able to choose to be in the System account.

An experimental feature to provide dynamically provisioned sandbox accounts was designed to allow a server administrator to turn on an option to allow clients to dynamically request a brand new account inline at connection time. This feature went nowhere, but lived on in the code and was used by a number of tests; support was never added to any client libraries or to the documentation.

A bug in handling the feature meant that if someone did in fact have valid account credentials, then they could specify any other existing account and they would be assigned into that account.

Release 2.7.2 of nats-server removes the feature. Because of the lack of client support and absence from protocol documentation, we feel this is safe operationally as well as the safest fix for the code.

Affected versions

NATS Server

  • All 2.x versions up to and including 2.7.1.
  • Fixed with nats-io/nats-server: 2.7.2
  • NATS Server 1.x did not have accounts.
  • Docker image: nats https://hub.docker.com/_/nats

NATS Streaming Server

  • All versions embedding affected NATS Server:
    • Affected: v0.15.0 up to and including v0.24.0
    • Fixed with nats-io/nats-streaming-server: 0.24.1
  • Docker image: nats-streaming https://hub.docker.com/_/nats-streaming

Impact

Existing users could act in any account, including the System account.

Workaround

None.

Solution

Upgrade the NATS server.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats-server/v22.0.0&&< 2.7.22.7.2
🐹Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats-streaming-server0.15.0&&< 0.24.10.24.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 to 2.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g6w6-r76c-28j7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g6w6-r76c-28j7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g6w6-r76c-28j7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

(This advisory is canonically <https://advisories.nats.io/CVE/CVE-2022-24450.txt>) ## Problem Description NATS nats-server through 2022-02-04 has Incorrect Access Control, with unchecked ability for clients to authorize into any account, because of a coding error in a long-extant experimental feature. A client crafting the initial protocol-level handshake could, with valid credentials for any account, specify a target account and switch into it immediately. This includes any other tenant, and includes the System account which controls nats-server core operations. For deployments not using
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g6w6-r76c-28j7 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g6w6-r76c-28j7 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.