Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💧 Hex
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63 ash_authentication

Fix: team-alembic/ash_authentication@d7c15c2

GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63 is a CWE-639 vulnerability in ash_authentication. A fix is available for ash_authentication — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Confirmation token accepted on any record in AshAuthentication

Also known asCVE-2026-82685
Published
Sep 17, 2026
Updated
Sep 17, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 17, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
💧ash_authentication

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Hex packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows an authenticated attacker to overwrite and confirm another user's email address, and so take over that account. A confirmation token issued to one user is accepted on any other user's record.

AshAuthentication.AddOn.Confirmation.ConfirmChange verifies the token's signature and its act claim, then applies the changes stored against that token to whichever record the changeset targets, never comparing the sub claim against changeset.data. An attacker who registers an account and changes their own email replays the resulting token against a victim's record id, writing in their own address with force_change_attributes/2 and stamping confirmed_at, after which an ordinary password reset yields the account. The library's own confirmation flow is unaffected, because AshAuthentication.AddOn.Confirmation.Actions.confirm/3 resolves sub to a user and targets that record.

This issue affects ash_authentication: from 0.5.0 before 4.15.0 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.14.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💧Hexash_authentication0.5.0&&< 4.15.04.15.0mix deps.update ash_authentication

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ash_authentication, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ash_authentication to 4.15.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows an authenticated attacker to overwrite and confirm another user's email address, and so take over that account. A confirmation token issued to one user is accepted on any other user's record. `AshAuthentication.AddOn.Confirmation.ConfirmChange` verifies the token's signature and its `act` claim, then applies the changes stored against that token to whichever record the changeset targets, never comparing the `sub` claim against `changeset.data`. An attacker who registers an accou
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63 across Hex dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-g636-26vf-2w63: ash_authentication | O3 Security