GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8
GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8 is a CWE-674 vulnerability in eml-parser. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
eml_parser has recursion DoS via nested message/rfc822 attachments
Real-World Exposure
eml-parserReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() recurses unconditionally for every nested message/rfc822 attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested message/rfc822 parts triggers an unhandled RecursionError and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker.
Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests.
Details
The vulnerable function is EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() in eml_parser/parser.py. For every part of type multipart/*, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type message/rfc822, it calls itself recursively on the inner message:
There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default sys.recursionlimit is 1000. Each level of message/rfc822 nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib _header_value_parser calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit.
The RecursionError is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of decode_email_bytes() and aborts processing of the entire message.
PoC
Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (pip install eml_parser==3.0.0), default sys.recursionlimit=1000, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of EmlParser, default constructor.
Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash:
import eml_parser
def build_poc(depth=124):
inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n"
msg = inner
for i in range(depth):
b = f"B{i}".encode()
msg = (
b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n'
b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n'
) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n'
return msg
ep = eml_parser.EmlParser()
ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc())
# RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64).
Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message.
Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes.
SHA-256 of generated PoC: 00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8
The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments.
Impact
Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using eml_parser.
A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad try/except. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop.
The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the build_poc function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue.
Reporter
Sebastián Alba Vives (@Sebasteuo)
Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba
Email: [email protected]
PGP: 0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | eml-parser | all versions | 3.0.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for eml-parser. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update eml-parser to 3.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.