GHSA-g3wg-6mcf-8jj6
HIGHLocal Temp Directory Hijacking Vulnerability
Blast Radius
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp☕org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-webapp☕org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp☕org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-webapp☕org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp☕org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-webappReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
On Unix like systems, the system's temporary directory is shared between all users on that system. A collocated user can observe the process of creating a temporary sub directory in the shared temporary directory and race to complete the creation of the temporary subdirectory. If the attacker wins the race then they will have read and write permission to the subdirectory used to unpack web applications, including their WEB-INF/lib jar files and JSP files. If any code is ever executed out of this temporary directory, this can lead to a local privilege escalation vulnerability.
Additionally, any user code uses of WebAppContext::getTempDirectory would similarly be vulnerable.
Additionally, any user application code using the ServletContext attribute for the tempdir will also be impacted.
See: https://javaee.github.io/javaee-spec/javadocs/javax/servlet/ServletContext.html#TEMPDIR
For example:
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import javax.servlet.ServletContext;
import javax.servlet.ServletException;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;
public class ExampleServlet extends HttpServlet {
@Override
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) throws ServletException, IOException {
File tempDir = (File)getServletContext().getAttribute(ServletContext.TEMPDIR); // Potentially compromised
// do something with that temp dir
}
}
Example: The JSP library itself will use the container temp directory for compiling the JSP source into Java classes before executing them.
CVSSv3.1 Evaluation
This vulnerability has been calculated to have a CVSSv3.1 score of 7.8/10 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
Patches
Fixes were applied to the 9.4.x branch with:
- https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/commit/53e0e0e9b25a6309bf24ee3b10984f4145701edb
- https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/commit/9ad6beb80543b392c91653f6bfce233fc75b9d5f
These will be included in releases: 9.4.33, 10.0.0.beta3, 11.0.0.beta3
Workarounds
A work around is to set a temporary directory, either for the server or the context, to a directory outside of the shared temporary file system.
For recent releases, a temporary directory can be created simple by creating a directory called work in the ${jetty.base} directory (the parent directory of the webapps directory).
Alternately the java temporary directory can be set with the System Property java.io.tmpdir. A more detailed description of how jetty selects a temporary directory is below.
The Jetty search order for finding a temporary directory is as follows:
- If the
WebAppContexthas a temp directory specified, use it. - If the
ServletContexthas thejavax.servlet.context.tempdirattribute set, and if directory exists, use it. - If a
${jetty.base}/workdirectory exists, use it (since Jetty 9.1) - If a
ServletContexthas theorg.eclipse.jetty.webapp.basetempdirattribute set, and if the directory exists, use it. - Use
System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir")and use it.
Jetty will end traversal at the first successful step. To mitigate this vulnerability the directory must be set to one that is not writable by an attacker. To avoid information leakage, the directory should also not be readable by an attacker.
Setting a Jetty server temporary directory.
Choices 3 and 5 apply to the server level, and will impact all deployed webapps on the server.
For choice 3 just create that work directory underneath your ${jetty.base} and restart Jetty.
For choice 5, just specify your own java.io.tmpdir when you start the JVM for Jetty.
[jetty-distribution]$ java -Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/web/work -jar start.jar
Setting a Context specific temporary directory.
The rest of the choices require you to configure the context for that deployed webapp (seen as ${jetty.base}/webapps/<context>.xml)
Example (excluding the DTD which is version specific):
<Configure class="org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext">
<Set name="contextPath"><Property name="foo"/></Set>
<Set name="war">/var/web/webapps/foo.war</Set>
<Set name="tempDirectory">/var/web/work/foo</Set>
</Configure>
References
- https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/5451
- CWE-378: Creation of Temporary File With Insecure Permissions
- CWE-379: Creation of Temporary File in Directory with Insecure Permissions
- CodeQL Query PR To Detect Similar Vulnerabilities
Similar Vulnerabilities
Similar, but not the same.
- JUnit 4 - https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/security/advisories/GHSA-269g-pwp5-87pp
- Google Guava - https://github.com/google/guava/issues/4011
- Apache Ant - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1945
- JetBrains Kotlin Compiler - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15824
For more information
The original report of this vulnerability is below:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 21:14, Jonathan Leitschuh [email protected] wrote: Hi WebTide Security Team,
I'm a security researcher writing some custom CodeQL queries to find Local Temporary Directory Hijacking Vulnerabilities. One of my queries flagged an issue in Jetty.
https://lgtm.com/query/5615014766184643449/
I've recently been looking into security vulnerabilities involving the temporary directory because on unix-like systems, the system temporary directory is shared between all users. There exists a race condition between the deletion of the temporary file and the creation of the directory.
// ensure file will always be unique by appending random digits tmpDir = File.createTempFile(temp, ".dir", parent); // Attacker knows the full path of the file that will be generated // delete the file that was created tmpDir.delete(); // Attacker sees file is deleted and begins a race to create their own directory before Jetty. // and make a directory of the same name // SECURITY VULNERABILITY: Race Condition! - Attacker beats Jetty and now owns this directory tmpDir.mkdirs();In several cases the
parentparameter will not be the system temporary directory. However, there is one case where it will be, as the last fallback.If any code is ever executed out of this temporary directory, this can lead to a local privilege escalation vulnerability.
Would your team be willing to open a GitHub security advisory to continue the discussion and disclosure there? https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories
This vulnerability disclosure follows Google's 90-day vulnerability disclosure policy (I'm not an employee of Google, I just like their policy). Full disclosure will occur either at the end of the 90-day deadline or whenever a patch is made widely available, whichever occurs first.
Cheers, Jonathan Leitschuh
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp | all versions | 9.4.33.v20201020 |
| ☕Maven | org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-webapp | all versions | 9.4.33 |
| ☕Maven | org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp | ≥ 10.0.0.beta1&&< 10.0.0.beta3 | 10.0.0.beta3 |
| ☕Maven | org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-webapp | ≥ 10.0.0.beta1&&< 10.0.0.beta3 | 10.0.0.beta3 |
| ☕Maven | org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp | ≥ 11.0.0.beta1&&< 11.0.0.beta3 | 11.0.0.beta3 |
| ☕Maven | org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-webapp | ≥ 11.0.0.beta1&&< 11.0.0.beta3 | 11.0.0.beta3 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp to 9.4.33.v20201020 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g3wg-6mcf-8jj6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g3wg-6mcf-8jj6 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-g3wg-6mcf-8jj6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g3wg-6mcf-8jj6 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-g3wg-6mcf-8jj6 across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.