Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj

HIGHFix: openclaw/openclaw#44087

GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) CWE-347 vulnerability in openclaw. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

OpenClaw: Feishu webhook mode accepted forged events when only `verificationToken` was configured

Also known asCVE-2026-32974
Published
Mar 13, 2026
Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Apr 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.

openclawnpm
3.2Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

Feishu webhook mode allowed deployments that configured only verificationToken without encryptKey. In that state, forged inbound events could be accepted because the weaker configuration did not provide the required cryptographic verification boundary.

Impact

An unauthenticated network attacker who could reach the webhook endpoint could inject forged Feishu events, impersonate senders, and potentially trigger downstream tool execution subject to the local agent policy.

Affected versions

openclaw <= 2026.3.11

Patch

Fixed in openclaw 2026.3.12. Feishu webhook mode now fails closed unless encryptKey is configured, and the webhook transport rejects missing or invalid signatures before dispatch. Update to 2026.3.12 or later and configure encryptKey for webhook deployments.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopenclawall versions2026.3.12

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update openclaw to 2026.3.12 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Feishu webhook mode allowed deployments that configured only `verificationToken` without `encryptKey`. In that state, forged inbound events could be accepted because the weaker configuration did not provide the required cryptographic verification boundary. ### Impact An unauthenticated network attacker who could reach the webhook endpoint could inject forged Feishu events, impersonate senders, and potentially trigger downstream tool execution subject to the local agent policy. ### Affected versions `openclaw` `<= 2026.3.11` ### Patch Fixed in `openclaw` `2026.3.12`. Feishu w
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-g353-mgv3-8pcj: openclaw (High 8.6) | O3 Security