Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎 RubyGems

GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5

MEDIUM

GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-1286 vulnerability in rack. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Rack::Request accepts invalid Host characters, enabling host allowlist bypass

Also known asCVE-2026-34835
Published
Apr 2, 2026
Updated
May 13, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
1 known

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
💎rack💎rack

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Rack::Request parses the Host header using an AUTHORITY regular expression that accepts characters not permitted in RFC-compliant hostnames, including /, ?, #, and @. Because req.host returns the full parsed value, applications that validate hosts using naive prefix or suffix checks can be bypassed.

For example, a check such as req.host.start_with?("myapp.com") can be bypassed with Host: [email protected], and a check such as req.host.end_with?("myapp.com") can be bypassed with Host: evil.com/myapp.com.

This can lead to host header poisoning in applications that use req.host, req.url, or req.base_url for link generation, redirects, or origin validation.

Details

Rack::Request parses the authority component using logic equivalent to:

AUTHORITY = /
  \A
  (?<host>
    \[(?<address>#{ipv6})\]
    |
    (?<address>[[[:graph:]&&[^\[\]]]]*?)
  )
  (:(?<port>\d+))?
  \z
/x

The character class used for non-IPv6 hosts accepts nearly all printable characters except [ and ]. This includes reserved URI delimiters such as @, /, ?, and #, which are not valid hostname characters under RFC 3986 host syntax.

As a result, values such as the following are accepted and returned through req.host:

[email protected]
evil.com/myapp.com
evil.com#myapp.com

Applications that attempt to allowlist hosts using string prefix or suffix checks may therefore treat attacker-controlled hosts as trusted. For example:

req.host.start_with?("myapp.com")

accepts:

[email protected]

and:

req.host.end_with?("myapp.com")

accepts:

evil.com/myapp.com

When those values are later used to build absolute URLs or enforce origin restrictions, the application may produce attacker-controlled results.

Impact

Applications that rely on req.host, req.url, or req.base_url may be affected if they perform naive host validation or assume Rack only returns RFC-valid hostnames.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass host allowlists and poison generated links, redirects, or origin-dependent security decisions. This can enable attacks such as password reset link poisoning or other host header injection issues.

The practical impact depends on application behavior. If the application or reverse proxy already enforces strict host validation, exploitability may be reduced or eliminated.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects invalid authority characters in Host.
  • Enforce strict Host header validation at the reverse proxy or load balancer.
  • Do not rely on prefix or suffix string checks such as start_with? or end_with? for host allowlisting.
  • Use exact host allowlists, or exact subdomain boundary checks, after validating that the host is syntactically valid.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemsrack3.0.0.beta1&&< 3.1.213.1.21
💎RubyGemsrack3.2.0&&< 3.2.63.2.6
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rack. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update rack to 3.1.21 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `Rack::Request` parses the `Host` header using an `AUTHORITY` regular expression that accepts characters not permitted in RFC-compliant hostnames, including `/`, `?`, `#`, and `@`. Because `req.host` returns the full parsed value, applications that validate hosts using naive prefix or suffix checks can be bypassed. For example, a check such as `req.host.start_with?("myapp.com")` can be bypassed with `Host: [email protected]`, and a check such as `req.host.end_with?("myapp.com")` can be bypassed with `Host: evil.com/myapp.com`. This can lead to host header poisoning in applicatio
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g2pf-xv49-m2h5 across RubyGems dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.