Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7

HIGH

Authenticated user can gain unauthorized shell pod and kubectl access in the local cluster

Also known asCVE-2022-21953
Published
Jan 25, 2023
Updated
Nov 8, 2023
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk37th percentile+0.12%
0.00%0.32%0.65%0.97%0.1%0.5%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/rancher/rancher🐹github.com/rancher/rancher🐹github.com/rancher/rancher

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An issue was discovered in Rancher where an authorization logic flaw allows an authenticated user on any downstream cluster to (1) open a shell pod in the Rancher local cluster and (2) have limited kubectl access to it. The expected behavior is that a user does not have such access in the Rancher local cluster unless explicitly granted.

This issue does not allow the user to escalate privileges in the local cluster directly (this would require another vulnerability to be exploited).

The security issue happens in two different ways:

  1. Shell pod access - This is when a user opens a shell pod in the Rancher UI to a downstream cluster that the user has permission to access. The web request can be intercepted using the browser's web inspector/network console or a proxy tool to change the shell's destination to the Rancher local cluster instead of the desired downstream cluster.

    • This flaw cannot be exploited to access a downstream cluster that the user has no permissions to.

    • The shell pod runs with a limited non-root user, reducing the severity of this issue. However, even as a non-root user, it is still possible download and run binaries inside the shell pod.

    • The blast radius of this issue can increase based on the configuration of the local cluster. For example:

      • If the local cluster has unlimited network access, e.g. to the Internet, the user can open a reverse network connection to the shell pod.

      • Or access the cloud metadata API of the underlying cloud infrastructure, where the user can extract the credentials associated with the local cluster and use them to interact with the cloud environment (this will be limited by the permissions granted to the cloud credentials in question).

      • Check further recommendations about liming access to the cloud metadata API in Rancher's security best practices.

  2. Kubectl access - When downloading the kubeconfig file of a downstream cluster that the user has access to, the server cluster address in the kubeconfig file can be changed to point to the Rancher local cluster instead of the intended downstream cluster.

    • This can also be achieved by crafting a kubeconfig using a Rancher token instead of using the kubeconfig from an active cluster.

    • This flaw cannot be exploited to access a downstream cluster that the user has no permissions to.

Notes:

  • Rancher local cluster means the cluster where Rancher is installed. It is named as local inside the list of clusters in the Rancher UI.
  • Audit logs in Rancher can be used to identify possible abuses of this issue, by tracking API requests to the user ID of the user that performed the action. API audit logs can be enabled as described in the documentation when set to level 1 or above.

Workarounds

There is no workaround or direct mitigation besides updating to a patched Rancher version.

Patches

Patched versions include releases 2.5.17, 2.6.10, 2.7.1 and later versions.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/rancher/rancher2.5.0&&< 2.5.172.5.17
🐹Gogithub.com/rancher/rancher2.6.0&&< 2.6.102.6.10
🐹Gogithub.com/rancher/rancher2.7.0&&< 2.7.12.7.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/rancher/rancher. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/rancher/rancher to 2.5.17 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An issue was discovered in Rancher where an authorization logic flaw allows an authenticated user on any downstream cluster to (1) open a shell pod in the Rancher `local` cluster and (2) have limited `kubectl` access to it. The expected behavior is that a user does not have such access in the Rancher `local` cluster unless explicitly granted. This issue does not allow the user to escalate privileges in the `local` cluster directly (this would require another vulnerability to be exploited). The security issue happens in two different ways: 1. Shell pod access - This is when a use
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.