Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-fxm2-cmwj-qvx4

HIGH

phpMyFAQ has Authenticated SQL Injection in Configuration Update Functionality

Also known asCVE-2025-62519
Published
Nov 17, 2025
Updated
Nov 17, 2025
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk48th percentile+0.58%
0.00%0.40%0.80%1.20%0.2%0.7%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐘thorsten/phpmyfaq🐘phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the main configuration update functionality of phpMyFAQ (v4.0.13 and prior) allows a privileged user with 'Configuration Edit' permissions to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Successful exploitation can lead to a full compromise of the database, including reading, modifying, or deleting all data, as well as potential remote code execution depending on the database configuration.

Details

The vulnerability exists in the save method within the src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/ConfigurationTabController.php controller. This method handles the saving of application-wide configuration settings. It retrieves all submitted form data as an associative array via $request->get('edit').

The core of the issue is that while the values of this array are processed, the keys are trusted implicitly and are not sanitized or validated.

File: src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/ConfigurationTabController.php

// ...
public function save(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT);

    $configurationData = $request->get('edit');
    // ...
    
    foreach ($configurationData as $key => $value) {
        // The key from the user input is used to build the $newConfigValues array.
        $newConfigValues[$key] = (string) $value;
        // ...
    }

    // ...
    // The array, containing user-controlled keys, is passed to the model.
    $this->configuration->update($newConfigValues);

    return $this->json(['success' => Translation::get('ad_config_saved')], Response::HTTP_OK);
}

The $newConfigValues array, which contains user-controlled keys, is then passed to the update method in the src/phpMyFAQ/Configuration.php model. Here, the key ($name) is directly concatenated into a raw SQL query string.

File: src/phpMyFAQ/Configuration.php

public function update(array $newConfigs): bool
{
    // ...
    foreach ($newConfigs as $name => $value) {
        if ($name != 'main.phpMyFAQToken' && !in_array($name, $runtimeConfigs)) {
            // VULNERABLE CODE: The array key '$name' is not escaped and is directly
            // concatenated into the SQL query string. The value is escaped, but not the name.
            $update = sprintf(
                "UPDATE %s%s SET config_value = '%s' WHERE config_name = '%s'",
                Database::getTablePrefix(),
                $this->tableName,
                $this->getDb()->escape(trim($value)),
                $name
            );

            $this->getDb()->query($update);
            // ...
        }
    }

    return true;
}

An attacker can craft a malicious form parameter name (which becomes the array key) to break out of the single quotes in the WHERE clause and inject arbitrary SQL commands.

PoC (Proof of Concept)

Prerequisites:

  1. A running instance of phpMyFAQ (v4.0.13 confirmed vulnerable).
  2. An authenticated user session with permissions to edit the configuration.

Execution: Due to the application's CSRF protection, the easiest way to reproduce this is by capturing a legitimate request to save the configuration and modifying it using a proxy tool like Burp Suite's Repeater.

  1. Log in as an administrator and navigate to Administration -> Configuration.
  2. Make a trivial change (e.g., toggle a setting) and click "Save configuration". Capture this POST request to /admin/api/configuration.
  3. Send the captured request to Repeater. The request will contain a valid Cookie header and a pmf-csrf-token parameter.
  4. Modify the request body to inject a malicious key. Add a new multipart/form-data part with a crafted name attribute.

Example Malicious Request Body Part (Error-Based):

------WebKitFormBoundaryRandomString
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="edit[dummykey' and updatexml(1, concat(0x7e, (SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = database() LIMIT 0, 1), 0x7e), 1) and '1]"

true
------WebKitFormBoundaryRandomString

Note: You must also include the pmf-csrf-token part from the original request in the body.

Result: The server will respond with a 500 Internal Server Error, and the body of the response will contain a database error message, confirming the SQL injection. The leaked data will be present within the error string.

An error occurred: XPATH syntax error: '~faq_faqadminlog~' at line 311 at /var/www/html/src/phpMyFAQ/Database/Mysqli.php

This error confirms the successful execution of the injected updatexml payload, which has extracted and revealed the name of the first table in the database (faq_faqadminlog). Time-based blind techniques can also be used to extract data without relying on error messages.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistthorsten/phpmyfaqall versions4.0.14
🐘Packagistphpmyfaq/phpmyfaqall versions4.0.14

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for thorsten/phpmyfaq. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update thorsten/phpmyfaq to 4.0.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fxm2-cmwj-qvx4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fxm2-cmwj-qvx4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-fxm2-cmwj-qvx4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the main configuration update functionality of phpMyFAQ (v4.0.13 and prior) allows a privileged user with 'Configuration Edit' permissions to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Successful exploitation can lead to a full compromise of the database, including reading, modifying, or deleting all data, as well as potential remote code execution depending on the database configuration. ### Details The vulnerability exists in the `save` method within the `src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/ConfigurationTabController.php` controller. Thi
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fxm2-cmwj-qvx4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-fxm2-cmwj-qvx4 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.