GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 — plane
HIGHGHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.5) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in plane. A fix is available for plane — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Plane has SSRF via Incomplete IP Validation in Webhook URL Serializer
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
planeReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The webhook URL validation in plane/app/serializers/webhook.py only checks ip.is_loopback, allowing attackers with workspace ADMIN role to create webhooks pointing to private/internal network addresses (10.x.x.x, 172.16.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 169.254.169.254, etc.). When webhook events fire, the server makes requests to these internal addresses and stores the response — enabling SSRF with full response read-back.
Impact
- Cloud metadata exfiltration: Access AWS/GCP/Azure instance metadata (IAM credentials, tokens)
- Internal service scanning: Probe internal network services not exposed to the internet
- Data exfiltration via response logs: Full response body from internal services is stored and returned to the attacker through the webhook logs API
- Bypass vectors:
10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16,169.254.0.0/16,0.0.0.0,::ffff:mapped addresses
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | plane | all versions | 1.2.3pip install --upgrade 'plane==1.2.3' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for plane, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update plane to 1.2.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-fpx8-73gf-7x73 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.