Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2 borsh

GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2 is a remote code execution vulnerability in borsh. A fix is available for borsh — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Parsing borsh messages with ZST which are not-copy/clone is unsound

Also known asRUSTSEC-2023-0033
Published
Apr 17, 2023
Updated
Sep 23, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 23, 2024 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀borsh

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Affected versions of borsh cause undefined behavior when zero-sized-types (ZST) are parsed and the Copy/Clone traits are not implemented/derived. For instance if 1000 instances of a ZST are deserialized, and the ZST is not copy (this can be achieved through a singleton), then accessing/writing to deserialized data will cause a segmentation fault.

There is currently no way for borsh to read data without also providing a Rust type. Therefore, if you are not using ZST for serialization, then you are not affected by this issue.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.ioborshall versions1.0.0-alpha.1cargo update -p borsh --precise 1.0.0-alpha.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for borsh, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update borsh to 1.0.0-alpha.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Affected versions of borsh cause undefined behavior when zero-sized-types (ZST) are parsed and the Copy/Clone traits are not implemented/derived. For instance if 1000 instances of a ZST are deserialized, and the ZST is not copy (this can be achieved through a singleton), then accessing/writing to deserialized data will cause a segmentation fault. There is currently no way for borsh to read data without also providing a Rust type. Therefore, if you are not using ZST for serialization, then you are not affected by this issue.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2: borsh | O3 Security