How severe is GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g?

GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g affects the following packages: aiohttp (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g?

Update aiohttp to 3.13.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aiohttp. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g?

GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.3%, placing it in the 25th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g?

GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g is classified as CWE-779 (CWE-779). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g was published on January 5, 2026 and was last updated on February 4, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g: AIOHTTP Vulnerable to Cookie Parser Warnin…

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk25th percentile+0.32%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

🐍aiohttp

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Reading multiple invalid cookies can lead to a logging storm.

Impact

If the cookies attribute is accessed in an application, then an attacker may be able to trigger a storm of warning-level logs using a specially crafted Cookie header.

Patch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/64629a0834f94e46d9881f4e99c41a137e1f3326

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`aiohttp`	all versions	3.13.3

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aiohttp. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update aiohttp to 3.13.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Reading multiple invalid cookies can lead to a logging storm. ### Impact If the ``cookies`` attribute is accessed in an application, then an attacker may be able to trigger a storm of warning-level logs using a specially crafted Cookie header. ---- Patch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/64629a0834f94e46d9881f4e99c41a137e1f3326

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works

GHSA-fh55-r93g-j68g