Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg kubewarden-controller

MEDIUMFix: kubewarden/kubewarden-controller@8124039

GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-155 vulnerability in github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller. A fix is available for github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller — see the affected versions and patch details below.

KubeWarden's AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources

Also known asCVE-2025-24376GO-2025-3434
Published
Jan 30, 2025
Updated
Feb 5, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs28th percentile — riskier than 28% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. See this section of Kubewarden’s documentation for more details about PolicyReport resources. An attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources. Moreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace.

Patches

Starting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources. The new validation will also restrict the usage of wildcards when defining apiGroups and resources rules for AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup objects.

Workarounds

On clusters running Kubewarden < 1.21.0, the following Kubewarden policy can be applied to prevent the creation of AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup resources that interact with PolicyReport resources:

apiVersion: policies.kubewarden.io/v1
kind: ClusterAdmissionPolicy
metadata:
  name: "deny-interaction-with-policyreport"
spec:
  module: registry://ghcr.io/kubewarden/policies/cel-policy:latest
  settings:
    variables:
      - name: hasWildcardInsideOfApiGroup
        expression: "object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.apiGroups.exists(ag, ag == '*'))"
      - name: hasWildcardInsideOfResources
        expression: "object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.resources.exists(ag, ag == '*' || ag == '*/*' || ag == 'policyreports/*'))"
      - name: dealsWithPolicyReportApiGroup
        expression: "object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.apiGroups.exists(ag, ag == 'wgpolicyk8s.io'))"
      - name: dealsWithPolicyReportResource
        expression: "object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.resources.exists(ag, ag == 'policyreports' || ag == 'policyreports/'))"
      - name: isPendingDeletion
        expression: "has(object.metadata.deletionTimestamp)"
    validations:
      - expression: |
          !( variables.hasWildcardInsideOfApiGroup ||
             variables.hasWildcardInsideOfResources ||
             variables.dealsWithPolicyReportResource ||
             variables.dealsWithPolicyReportApiGroup
          ) || variables.isPendingDeletion
        message: "cannot target PolicyReport resources or use wildcards in apiGroups or resources"
  rules:
    - apiGroups: ["policies.kubewarden.io"]
      apiVersions: ["v1"]
      operations: ["CREATE", "UPDATE"]
      resources: ["admissionpolicies", "admissionpolicygroups"]
  mutating: false
  backgroundAudit: true

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory you can contact the Kubewarden team using the procedures described under the “security disclosure“ guidelines of the Kubewarden project.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller1.7.0&&< 1.21.01.21.0go get github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller@v1.21.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller to 1.21.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. See [this section](https://docs.kubewarden.io/explanations/audit-scanner/policy-reports) of K
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg: kubewarden-controller | O3 Security