GHSA-f46r-rw29-r322
HIGHReact Router allows a DoS via cache poisoning by forcing SPA mode
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
react-routerReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
After some research, it turns out that it is possible to force an application to switch to SPA mode by adding a header to the request. If the application uses SSR and is forced to switch to SPA, this causes an error that completely corrupts the page. If a cache system is in place, this allows the response containing the error to be cached, resulting in a cache poisoning that strongly impacts the availability of the application.
Details
The vulnerable header is X-React-Router-SPA-Mode; adding it to a request sent to a page/endpoint using a loader throws an error. Here is the vulnerable code :
To use the header, React-router must be used in Framework mode, and for the attack to be possible the target page must use a loader.
Steps to reproduce
Versions used for our PoC:
- "@react-router/node": "^7.5.0",
- "@react-router/serve": "^7.5.0",
- "react": "^19.0.0"
- "react-dom": "^19.0.0"
- "react-router": "^7.5.0"
- Install React-Router with its default configuration in Framework mode (https://reactrouter.com/start/framework/installation)
- Add a simple page using a loader (example:
routes/ssr)
- Send a request to the endpoint using the loader (
/ssrin our case) adding the following header:
X-React-Router-SPA-Mode: yes
Notice the difference between a request with and without the header;
Normal request
With the header
Impact
If a system cache is in place, it is possible to poison the response by completely altering its content (by an error message), strongly impacting its availability, making the latter impractical via a cache-poisoning attack.
Credits
- Rachid Allam (zhero;)
- Yasser Allam (inzo_)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | react-router | ≥ 7.2.0&&< 7.5.2 | 7.5.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for react-router. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update react-router to 7.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-f46r-rw29-r322 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-f46r-rw29-r322 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-f46r-rw29-r322. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-f46r-rw29-r322 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-f46r-rw29-r322 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.