How severe is GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64?

GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 has a CVSS score of 2.8/10, rated LOW. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64?

GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 affects the following packages: electron (npm), electron (npm), electron (npm), electron (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64?

Update electron to 39.8.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for electron, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.

Is GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64?

GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.1%, placing it in the 4th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64?

GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 is classified as NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 was published on April 7, 2026 and was last updated on April 8, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦

📦 npm

Not in CISA KEV

LOW severity

Electron: Crash in clipboard.readImage() on malformed clipboard image dataGHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64

LOWFix: electron/electron#50475

GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 is a low-severity (CVSS 2.8) NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in electron. A fix is available for electron — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-34781

Published

Apr 7, 2026

Updated

Apr 8, 2026

Affected

4 pkgs

Patched

4 / 4

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk+0.01%

Lower risk than most CVEs4th percentile — riskier than 4% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

4 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

2Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream

electronnpm

12.7Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

Apps that call clipboard.readImage() may be vulnerable to a denial of service. If the system clipboard contains image data that fails to decode, the resulting null bitmap is passed unchecked to image construction, triggering a controlled abort and crashing the process.

Apps are only affected if they call clipboard.readImage(). Apps that do not read images from the clipboard are not affected. This issue does not allow memory corruption or code execution.

Workarounds

Validate that the clipboard contains image data via clipboard.availableFormats() before calling clipboard.readImage(). Note this only narrows the window — upgrading to a fixed version is recommended.

Fixed Versions

42.0.0-alpha.5
41.1.0
40.8.5
39.8.5

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at [email protected]

Affected Packages

4 total 4 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`electron`	all versions	39.8.5`npm install electron@39.8.5`
📦npm	`electron`	≥ 40.0.0-alpha.1&&< 40.8.5	40.8.5`npm install electron@40.8.5`
📦npm	`electron`	≥ 41.0.0-alpha.1&&< 41.1.0	41.1.0`npm install electron@41.1.0`
📦npm	`electron`	≥ 42.0.0-alpha.1&&< 42.0.0-alpha.5	42.0.0-alpha.5`npm install electron@42.0.0-alpha.5`

Affected Products

1 product · 8 configurations

Application

electronelectronjs

≥ 41.0.0 && ≤ 40.8.4

2 versions

41.2.042.0.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for electron, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update electron to 39.8.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Workaround published by Red Hat

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-f37v-82c4-4x64 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Apps that call `clipboard.readImage()` may be vulnerable to a denial of service. If the system clipboard contains image data that fails to decode, the resulting null bitmap is passed unchecked to image construction, triggering a controlled abort and crashing the process. Apps are only affected if they call `clipboard.readImage()`. Apps that do not read images from the clipboard are not affected. This issue does not allow memory corruption or code execution. ### Workarounds Validate that the clipboard contains image data via `clipboard.availableFormats()` before calling `clipboard.