Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97

MEDIUM

Vyper's `_abi_decode` input not validated in complex expressions

Also known asCVE-2023-42460PYSEC-2023-191
Published
Sep 26, 2023
Updated
Nov 19, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk42th percentile+0.51%
0.00%0.35%0.70%1.05%0.0%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

_abi_decode() does not validate input when it is nested in an expression. the following example gets correctly validated (bounds checked):

x: int128 = _abi_decode(slice(msg.data, 4, 32), int128)

however, the following example is not bounds checked

@external
def abi_decode(x: uint256) -> uint256:
    a: uint256 = convert(_abi_decode(slice(msg.data, 4, 32), (uint8)), uint256) + 1
    return a  # abi_decode(256) returns: 257

the issue can be triggered by constructing an example where the output of _abi_decode is not internally passed to make_setter (an internal codegen routine) or other input validating routine.

Patches

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3626

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyper0.3.4&&< 0.3.100.3.10
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.3.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact `_abi_decode()` does not validate input when it is nested in an expression. the following example gets correctly validated (bounds checked): ```vyper x: int128 = _abi_decode(slice(msg.data, 4, 32), int128) ``` however, the following example is not bounds checked ```vyper @external def abi_decode(x: uint256) -> uint256: a: uint256 = convert(_abi_decode(slice(msg.data, 4, 32), (uint8)), uint256) + 1 return a # abi_decode(256) returns: 257 ``` the issue can be triggered by constructing an example where the output of `_abi_decode` is not internally passed to `make_setter` (an
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.