Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv skipper

MEDIUM

GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-770 vulnerability in github.com/zalando/skipper. A fix is available for github.com/zalando/skipper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Skipper: Unbounded Request Body Read in Admission Webhook Causes Memory Exhaustion DoS

Also known asCVE-2026-54247GO-2026-6015
Published
Jul 17, 2026
Updated
Jul 22, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs14th percentile — riskier than 14% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/zalando/skipper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The Kubernetes admission webhook handler reads the entire request body using io.ReadAll(r.Body) without any size limit. Any client that can reach the webhook port within the cluster can send a multi-GB payload, causing the skipper process to exhaust memory and be OOM-killed. This disrupts all Kubernetes admission control, potentially blocking all pod creation and updates.

Vulnerable Code

// dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission.go:76
body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body)  // <-- NO SIZE LIMIT
if err != nil {
    log.Errorf("Failed to read request: %v", err)
    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusInternalServerError)
    invalidRequests.WithLabelValues(admitterName).Inc()
    return
}

var review admissionReview
err = json.Unmarshal(body, &review)

For comparison, the OPA filter has a body size limit:

// filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go:68-70
const DefaultMaxRequestBodySize = 1 << 20 // 1MB

// OPA uses a bufferedBodyReader with size limits

Attack Path

  1. Attacker identifies the admission webhook endpoint (default: :9443/admission or configured path)
  2. Attacker sends: POST /admission HTTP/1.1, Content-Type: application/json with a multi-GB request body
  3. io.ReadAll(r.Body) allocates unbounded memory for the entire body
  4. Skipper process is OOM-killed by the Kubernetes kubelet

Permission Boundary Analysis

  • Attacker: Any client with network access to the admission webhook port within the Kubernetes cluster
  • Boundary crossed: Memory safety — unbounded allocation from attacker-controlled input
  • Preconditions: Admission webhook endpoint must be network-reachable (default Kubernetes deployment exposes it within cluster network)
  • Comparison: OPA filter has DefaultMaxRequestBodySize (1MB) and semaphore-based memory limit; admission handler has neither

Evidence

FileLinesDescription
dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission.go76io.ReadAll(r.Body) without size limit
filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go68-70OPA filter has DefaultMaxRequestBodySize = 1MB
filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go1333-1336OPA uses bufferedBodyReader with size limits

Tests

  • dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission_test.go exists but does not test body size limits

Impact

The admission webhook handler reads the entire request body using io.ReadAll(r.Body) without a size limit. An attacker with in-cluster network access and a valid Kubernetes client certificate can send a multi-GB payload to the webhook endpoint, causing the skipper process to exhaust memory and be OOM-killed. This disrupts admission control for Ingress and RouteGroup resources until the process is automatically restarted by the kubelet.

Scope of impact: Ingress and RouteGroup admission only — not pod creation or other admission controllers.

Recovery: Kubernetes automatically restarts the OOM-killed process, limiting downtime.

Prerequisites: (1) In-cluster network access to the webhook port, (2) valid Kubernetes client certificate.

Mitigation

  1. Add http.MaxBytesReader or equivalent body size limit before io.ReadAll
  2. Follow the OPA filter pattern: define DefaultMaxRequestBodySize and use a buffered reader with size limits
  3. Add a configurable --admission-max-body-size flag

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/zalando/skipperall versions0.26.22go get github.com/zalando/skipper@v0.26.22

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/zalando/skipper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/zalando/skipper to 0.26.22 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The Kubernetes admission webhook handler reads the entire request body using `io.ReadAll(r.Body)` without any size limit. Any client that can reach the webhook port within the cluster can send a multi-GB payload, causing the skipper process to exhaust memory and be OOM-killed. This disrupts all Kubernetes admission control, potentially blocking all pod creation and updates. ## Vulnerable Code ```go // dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission.go:76 body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body) // <-- NO SIZE LIMIT if err != nil { log.Errorf("Failed to read request: %v", err) w.WriteH
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv: skipper (Medium 4.3) | O3 Security