Yamcs Vulnerable to LDAP Injection in LdapAuthModuleGHSA-cqh3-jg8p-336j
MEDIUMGHSA-cqh3-jg8p-336j is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-90 vulnerability in org.yamcs:yamcs-core. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for org.yamcs:yamcs-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-cqh3-jg8p-336j.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-cqh3-jg8p-336j by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 384,189 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
org.yamcs:yamcs-coreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An LDAP injection vulnerability exists in org.yamcs.security.LdapAuthModule when constructing search filters. The username parameter is inserted directly into the LDAP filter without proper RFC 4515 escaping.
Root Cause
File: yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/security/LdapAuthModule.java:233
The username parameter is inserted directly into an LDAP search filter without RFC 4515 escaping:
// VULNERABLE
var filter = userFilter.replace("{0}", username);
var searchResult = getSingleResult(ctx, userBase, filter, controls);
LDAP wildcard characters (*, (, )) are accepted without sanitization.
Impact
With a known valid password, username=* authenticates as the first user returned by the LDAP search — enabling horizontal privilege escalation between accounts sharing similar passwords or when the attacker knows one valid password.
This affects deployments that use org.yamcs.security.LdapAuthModule in their etc/security.yaml configuration file.
Proof of Concept
curl -X POST "http://TARGET:8090/auth/token" \
-d "grant_type=password&username=*&password=known_password"
# Returns token for first matching LDAP user
Fix
Apply RFC 4515 escaping before filter construction:
private static String escapeLdapFilter(String input) {
return input
.replace("\\", "\\5c")
.replace("*", "\\2a")
.replace("(", "\\28")
.replace(")", "\\29")
.replace("\0", "\\00");
}
var filter = userFilter.replace("{0}", escapeLdapFilter(username));
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.yamcs:yamcs-core | all versions | 5.12.7org.yamcs:yamcs-core:5.12.7 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
YAMCS yamcs-core 5.12.7 - LDAP Injection
by Daniel Miranda · May 30, 2026
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.yamcs:yamcs-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update org.yamcs:yamcs-core to 5.12.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cqh3-jg8p-336j is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Close the privilege gap rather than the entry point: audit which accounts, roles and service identities can reach the affected operation, drop the component to the least privilege it actually needs, and review file and directory permissions created by earlier installs — a default left in place is what makes this reachable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cqh3-jg8p-336j in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.