Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎 RubyGems

GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73

CRITICAL

JWE is missing AES-GCM authentication tag validation in encrypted JWE

Also known asCVE-2025-54887
Published
Aug 7, 2025
Updated
Aug 8, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk14th percentile+0.22%
0.00%0.24%0.49%0.73%0.0%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
💎jwe

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Overview

The authentication tag of encrypted JWEs can be brute forced, which may result in loss of confidentiality for those JWEs and provide ways to craft arbitrary JWEs.

Impact

  • JWEs can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value
  • JWEs can be decrypted by observing parsing differences
  • The GCM internal GHASH key can be recovered

Am I Affected?

You are affected by this vulnerability even if you do not use an AES-GCM encryption algorithm for your JWEs.

Patches

The version 1.1.1 fixes the issue by adding the tag length check for the AES-GCM algorithm.

Important: As the GHASH key could have leaked, you must rotate the encryption keys after upgrading to version 1.1.1.

References

Félix Charette talk at NorthSec 2025 about the issue

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemsjweall versions1.1.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for jwe. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update jwe to 1.1.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Overview The authentication tag of encrypted JWEs can be brute forced, which may result in loss of confidentiality for those JWEs and provide ways to craft arbitrary JWEs. ### Impact - JWEs can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value - JWEs can be decrypted by observing parsing differences - The GCM internal [GHASH key](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois/Counter_Mode#:~:text=\)%20is%20the-,hash%20key,-%2C%20a%20string%20of) can be recovered ### Am I Affected? You are affected by this vulnerability even if you do not use an `AES-GCM` encryption algorithm for your JWEs. ### Patche
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73 across RubyGems dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.