Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm

CRITICAL

LangChain serialization injection vulnerability enables secret extraction in dumps/loads APIs

Also known asCVE-2025-68664
Published
Dec 23, 2025
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
2 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
13.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Moderate Risk96th percentile+11.57%
0.00%5.99%12.0%18.0%0.1%13.8%Jan 26Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐍langchain-core🐍langchain-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data.

Attack surface

The core vulnerability was in dumps() and dumpd(): these functions failed to escape user-controlled dictionaries containing 'lc' keys. When this unescaped data was later deserialized via load() or loads(), the injected structures were treated as legitimate LangChain objects rather than plain user data.

This escaping bug enabled several attack vectors:

  1. Injection via user data: Malicious LangChain object structures could be injected through user-controlled fields like metadata, additional_kwargs, or response_metadata
  2. Class instantiation within trusted namespaces: Injected manifests could instantiate any Serializable subclass, but only within the pre-approved trusted namespaces (langchain_core, langchain, langchain_community). This includes classes with side effects in __init__ (network calls, file operations, etc.). Note that namespace validation was already enforced before this patch, so arbitrary classes outside these trusted namespaces could not be instantiated.

Security hardening

This patch fixes the escaping bug in dumps() and dumpd() and introduces new restrictive defaults in load() and loads(): allowlist enforcement via allowed_objects="core" (restricted to serialization mappings), secrets_from_env changed from True to False, and default Jinja2 template blocking via init_validator. These are breaking changes for some use cases.

Who is affected?

Applications are vulnerable if they:

  1. Use astream_events(version="v1") — The v1 implementation internally uses vulnerable serialization. Note: astream_events(version="v2") is not vulnerable.
  2. Use Runnable.astream_log() — This method internally uses vulnerable serialization for streaming outputs.
  3. Call dumps() or dumpd() on untrusted data, then deserialize with load() or loads() — Trusting your own serialization output makes you vulnerable if user-controlled data (e.g., from LLM responses, metadata fields, or user inputs) contains 'lc' key structures.
  4. Deserialize untrusted data with load() or loads() — Directly deserializing untrusted data that may contain injected 'lc' structures.
  5. Use RunnableWithMessageHistory — Internal serialization in message history handling.
  6. Use InMemoryVectorStore.load() to deserialize untrusted documents.
  7. Load untrusted generations from cache using langchain-community caches.
  8. Load untrusted manifests from the LangChain Hub via hub.pull.
  9. Use StringRunEvaluatorChain on untrusted runs.
  10. Use create_lc_store or create_kv_docstore with untrusted documents.
  11. Use MultiVectorRetriever with byte stores containing untrusted documents.
  12. Use LangSmithRunChatLoader with runs containing untrusted messages.

The most common attack vector is through LLM response fields like additional_kwargs or response_metadata, which can be controlled via prompt injection and then serialized/deserialized in streaming operations.

Impact

Attackers who control serialized data can extract environment variable secrets by injecting {"lc": 1, "type": "secret", "id": ["ENV_VAR"]} to load environment variables during deserialization (when secrets_from_env=True, which was the old default). They can also instantiate classes with controlled parameters by injecting constructor structures to instantiate any class within trusted namespaces with attacker-controlled parameters, potentially triggering side effects such as network calls or file operations.

Key severity factors:

  • Affects the serialization path - applications trusting their own serialization output are vulnerable
  • Enables secret extraction when combined with secrets_from_env=True (the old default)
  • LLM responses in additional_kwargs can be controlled via prompt injection

Exploit example

from langchain_core.load import dumps, load
import os

# Attacker injects secret structure into user-controlled data
attacker_dict = {
    "user_data": {
        "lc": 1,
        "type": "secret",
        "id": ["OPENAI_API_KEY"]
    }
}

serialized = dumps(attacker_dict)  # Bug: does NOT escape the 'lc' key

os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "sk-secret-key-12345"
deserialized = load(serialized, secrets_from_env=True)

print(deserialized["user_data"])  # "sk-secret-key-12345" - SECRET LEAKED!

Security hardening changes (breaking changes)

This patch introduces three breaking changes to load() and loads():

  1. New allowed_objects parameter (defaults to 'core'): Enforces allowlist of classes that can be deserialized. The 'all' option corresponds to the list of objects specified in mappings.py while the 'core' option limits to objects within langchain_core. We recommend that users explicitly specify which objects they want to allow for serialization/deserialization.
  2. secrets_from_env default changed from True to False: Disables automatic secret loading from environment
  3. New init_validator parameter (defaults to default_init_validator): Blocks Jinja2 templates by default

Migration guide

No changes needed for most users

If you're deserializing standard LangChain types (messages, documents, prompts, trusted partner integrations like ChatOpenAI, ChatAnthropic, etc.), your code will work without changes:

from langchain_core.load import load

# Uses default allowlist from serialization mappings
obj = load(serialized_data)

For custom classes

If you're deserializing custom classes not in the serialization mappings, add them to the allowlist:

from langchain_core.load import load
from my_package import MyCustomClass

# Specify the classes you need
obj = load(serialized_data, allowed_objects=[MyCustomClass])

For Jinja2 templates

Jinja2 templates are now blocked by default because they can execute arbitrary code. If you need Jinja2 templates, pass init_validator=None:

from langchain_core.load import load
from langchain_core.prompts import PromptTemplate

obj = load(
    serialized_data,
    allowed_objects=[PromptTemplate],
    init_validator=None
)

[!WARNING] Only disable init_validator if you trust the serialized data. Jinja2 templates can execute arbitrary Python code.

For secrets from environment

secrets_from_env now defaults to False. If you need to load secrets from environment variables:

from langchain_core.load import load

obj = load(serialized_data, secrets_from_env=True)

Credits

  • Dumps bug was reported by @yardenporat
  • Changes for security hardening due to findings from @0xn3va and @VladimirEliTokarev

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangchain-core1.0.0&&< 1.2.51.2.5
🐍PyPIlangchain-coreall versions0.3.81
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

EDB-52514webappsmultiple

LangChain Core 1.2.4 - SSTI/RCE

by banyamer · Apr 29, 2026

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langchain-core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update langchain-core to 1.2.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary A serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's `dumps()` and `dumpd()` functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with `'lc'` keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The `'lc'` key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. ### Attack surface The core vulnerability was in `dumps()` and `dumpd()`: these functions failed to escape user-controlled dictionaries containing `'lc'` keys. W
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.