Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp

MEDIUMFix: eLyiN/gemini-bridge#9

GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.2) Path Traversal vulnerability in gemini-bridge. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

gemini-bridge vulnerable to arbitrary local file read via consult_gemini_with_files inline mode

Also known asCVE-2026-54785PYSEC-2026-3574
Published
Jul 31, 2026
Updated
Aug 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs5th percentile — riskier than 5% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.22%0.43%0.65%0.2%0.2%0.2%Aug 26Sep 26Sep 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 372,613 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍gemini-bridge

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read.

Impact

An MCP client — or an LLM that has been prompt-injected into calling the tool — can read any file the server process can access (SSH keys, cloud credentials, .env, source) and have it disclosed via the tool response. No code execution by itself.

Affected component

  • Tool: consult_gemini_with_files(query, directory, files, …), mode="inline"
  • Sink: _read_file_for_inline via _prepare_inline_payload in src/mcp_server.py
  • The at_command mode already confined paths; inline mode did not.

Root cause

_resolve_path returned an out-of-root path while only nullifying the display name, and _prepare_inline_payload read the file regardless. Absolute paths, .. traversal, and symlink escapes were all accepted.

Patch

Fixed in 1.3.1. _resolve_path now resolves symlinks and confines via Path.relative_to(root); inline mode skips any entry that resolves outside the working directory (the same guard at_command already enforced).

Workarounds

Upgrade to 1.3.1. Before upgrading, avoid mode="inline" with untrusted files input, or run the server with a restricted-permission user.

Credit

Reported privately by Zhihao Zhang (WPI).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIgemini-bridge1.0.0&&< 1.3.11.3.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gemini-bridge. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update gemini-bridge to 1.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `consult_gemini_with_files` in **inline mode** read any file path supplied in the `files` argument without confining it to the working `directory`, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls `query`, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. ### Impact An MCP client — or an LLM that has been prompt-injected into calling the tool — can read **any file the server process can access** (SSH keys, cloud credentials, `.env`, source) and have it disclosed via the too
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-c5px-58j2-7fqp: gemini-bridge | O3 Security