GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-494 vulnerability in johnbillion/wp-crontrol. A fix is available for johnbillion/wp-crontrol — see the affected versions and patch details below.
WP Crontrol vulnerable to possible RCE when combined with a pre-condition
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
johnbillion/wp-crontrolReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
WP Crontrol includes a feature that allows administrative users to create events in the WP-Cron system that store and execute PHP code subject to the restrictive security permissions documented here. While there is no known vulnerability in this feature on its own, there exists potential for this feature to be vulnerable to RCE if it were specifically targeted via vulnerability chaining that exploited a separate SQLi (or similar) vulnerability.
This is exploitable on a site if one of the below preconditions are met:
- The site is vulnerable to a writeable SQLi vulnerability in any plugin, theme, or WordPress core
- The site's database is compromised at the hosting level
- The site is vulnerable to a method of updating arbitrary options in the
wp_optionstable - The site is vulnerable to a method of triggering an arbitrary action, filter, or function with control of the parameters
Patches
As a hardening measure, WP Crontrol version 1.16.2 ships with a new feature that prevents tampering of the code stored in a PHP cron event.
All PHP cron events are now secured via an integrity check that makes use of an HMAC to store a hash of the code alongside it when the event is saved. When the event runs, the hash is verified to ensure the code has not been tampered with. WP Crontrol will not execute the PHP code if the hash cannot be verified or if a stored hash is not present. If an attacker with database-level access were to modify the code in an event in an attempt to execute arbitrary code, the code would no longer execute.
Any PHP cron events that exist in the database prior to updating to version 1.16.2 will cease to execute until an administrative user re-saves them from the Cron Events screen in the admin area. A notice will be shown in the admin area informing administrative users if this is the case.
Workarounds
Given that one or more of the preconditions listed above are met, there are no known workarounds for this issue other than to update WP Crontrol to version 1.16.2 or later.
Note that neither the DISALLOW_FILE_MODS constant nor the DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT constant prevent this from being exploitable because these constants do not prevent PHP cron events from being executed. It's an intended feature of WP Crontrol that PHP cron events in the database will continue to run according to their schedule even if editing PHP cron events is disabled due to one of these constants being defined.
FAQ
Is my site at risk?
Your site is only at risk if at least one of the preconditions listed above are met and an attacker is actively attacking your site in order to exploit this. There is no known vulnerability in this feature on its own.
Why is this classified as high severity?
The CVSS score is used to classify the severity of a vulnerability in isolation, which in this case is high due to the possibility of RCE. The actual risk is likely to be low and is dependent entirely on one of the preconditions being met.
How is this any different to an SQLi vulnerability that would allow an attacker to create an Administrator user and then access the theme or plugin editor?
The difference is in the handling of the DISALLOW_FILE_MODS and DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT constants. With either one of these constants defined in your wp-config.php file then the plugin and theme editors are disabled. In WP Crontrol the ability to edit PHP cron events in WP Crontrol is also disabled in this case, however PHP cron events in the database will continue to run according to their schedule.
Thanks
This issue was identified by John Blackbourn, the author of the WP Crontrol plugin.
Thanks go to:
- Calvin Alkan for researching and reporting many vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins and for publishing the details on the snicco blog. Calvin's work prompted me to investigate whether the PHP cron event functionality in WP Crontrol could be exploited when attacked via with vulnerability chaining, and he collaborated on this security advisory.
- Joe Hoyle for collaborating on this advisory.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | johnbillion/wp-crontrol | all versions | 1.16.2composer require johnbillion/wp-crontrol:^1.16.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for johnbillion/wp-crontrol, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update johnbillion/wp-crontrol to 1.16.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-9xvf-cjvf-ff5q across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.