GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 — studiocms
MEDIUMGHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-639 vulnerability in studiocms. A fix is available for studiocms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
StudioCMS: IDOR in User Notification Preferences Allows Any Authenticated User to Modify Any User's Settings
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
studiocmsnpmDescription
Summary
The updateUserNotifications endpoint accepts a user ID from the request payload and uses it to update that user's notification preferences. It checks that the caller is logged in but never verifies that the caller owns the target account (id !== userData.user.id). Any authenticated visitor can modify notification preferences for any user, including disabling admin notifications to suppress detection of malicious activity.
Details
The vulnerable handler is in packages/studiocms/frontend/pages/studiocms_api/_handlers/dashboard/users.ts:257-311:
.handle(
'updateUserNotifications',
Effect.fn(function* ({ payload: { id, notifications } }) {
// ...demo mode checks...
const [sdk, userData] = yield* Effect.all([SDKCore, CurrentUser]);
// Line 274: Only checks login + visitor level — any authenticated user passes
if (!userData.isLoggedIn || !userData.userPermissionLevel.isVisitor) {
return yield* new DashboardAPIError({ error: 'Unauthorized' });
}
// Line 280: Uses 'id' from payload — NOT userData.user.id
const existingUser = yield* sdk.GET.users.byId(id);
// Line 288: Updates target user using attacker-controlled 'id'
const updatedData = yield* sdk.AUTH.user.update({
userId: id, // ← attacker controls this
userData: {
id, // ← attacker controls this
name: existingUser.name,
username: existingUser.username,
updatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
emailVerified: existingUser.emailVerified,
createdAt: undefined,
notifications, // ← attacker controls this
},
});
})
)
For comparison, the updateUserProfile handler in dashboard/profile.ts correctly uses userData.user.id instead of a user-supplied ID, preventing IDOR.
PoC
# 1. Log in as a visitor-role user, obtain session cookie
# 2. Disable all notifications for the admin user
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:4321/studiocms_api/dashboard/update-user-notifications' \
-H 'Cookie: studiocms-session=<visitor-session-token>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"id": "<admin-user-id>",
"notifications": ""
}'
# Expected: 403 Forbidden
# Actual: 200 {"message":"User notifications updated successfully"}
Impact
- Any authenticated visitor can disable notification preferences for admin/owner accounts, suppressing alerts about new user creation, account changes, and user deletions
- Enables attack chaining — suppress admin notifications first, then perform other malicious actions with reduced detection risk
- Can modify any user's notification preferences (enable unwanted notifications or disable critical ones)
Recommended Fix
Add an ownership check in packages/studiocms/frontend/pages/studiocms_api/_handlers/dashboard/users.ts:
// After the login check at line 274, add:
if (id !== userData.user?.id && !userData.userPermissionLevel.isAdmin) {
return yield* new DashboardAPIError({
error: 'Unauthorized: cannot modify another user\'s notification preferences',
});
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | studiocms | all versions | 0.4.3npm install studiocms@0.4.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for studiocms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update studiocms to 0.4.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-9v82-xrm4-mp52 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.