joserfc: Compact JWS size guard allocates attacker-controlled segments before rejectionGHSA-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx
Fix: authlib/joserfc@397e04fGHSA-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx is a Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in joserfc. A fix is available for joserfc — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
joserfcReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
joserfc 1.7.4 defines compact-JWS header, payload, and signature limits, but
calls value.split(b".") before validating them. Python bytes.split() copies
the attacker-controlled segments, so the current guard allocates roughly one
complete payload before rejecting it.
Reproduction
.venv-research/bin/python 06-practical-testing/preauth-memory-profile.py
The input is resident before a fork-isolated verifier runs, and every signature is invalid.
| Input | Peak RSS delta | Amplification | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 MiB | 1.11 MiB | 1.11× | size rejected |
| 4 MiB | 4.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 8 MiB | 8.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 16 MiB | 16.04 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |
| 32 MiB | 31.74 MiB | 0.99× | size rejected |
| 64 MiB | 63.80 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |
The unconstrained profile is the primary evidence: joserfc allocates an
additional attacker-sized object before producing its intended
ExceededSizeError. A separate baseline-plus-headroom stress test raises
MemoryError when that copy cannot fit, but this report does not characterize
an absolute RLIMIT_AS value as a realistic worker memory budget.
Security Argument
The issue is not that joserfc can prevent the transport layer from receiving a
large header. The issue is narrower: once bytes reach deserialize_compact(),
the library's existing size guard cannot fulfill its allocation-limiting purpose
because attacker-controlled segment copies are created first.
This differs from GHSA-frfh-8v73-gjg4, which concerned embedding already-loaded oversized segments in exception and log messages. Here, the current implementation itself creates an additional payload-sized allocation before its fixed size exception.
Recommended Fix
Check len(value) against a maximum compact-serialization size before
split(). If per-segment diagnostics are needed, locate delimiters with bounded
find() operations or memory views, validate offsets and lengths, and only then
materialize acceptable segments.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | joserfc | all versions | 1.7.6pip install --upgrade 'joserfc==1.7.6' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for joserfc, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update joserfc to 1.7.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.