Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 @clerk/backend

HIGH

GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-345 vulnerability in @clerk/backend. A fix is available for @clerk/backend — see the affected versions and patch details below.

@clerk/backend Performs Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Also known asCVE-2025-53548
Published
Jul 9, 2025
Updated
Jul 9, 2025
Affected
9 pkgs
Patched
9 / 9
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs5th percentile — riskier than 5% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

9 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

103other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@clerk/backendnpm
3.6Mdownloads / week
@clerk/astronpm
28Kdownloads / week
@clerk/expressnpm
259Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

Applications that use the verifyWebhook() helper to verify incoming Clerk webhooks are susceptible to accepting improperly signed webhook events.

Patches

  • @clerk/backend: the helper has been patched as of 2.4.0
  • @clerk/astro: the helper has been patched as of 2.10.2
  • @clerk/express: the helper has been patched as of 1.7.4
  • @clerk/fastify: the helper has been patched as of 2.4.4
  • @clerk/nextjs: the helper has been patched as of 6.23.3
  • @clerk/nuxt: the helper has been patched as of 1.7.5
  • @clerk/react-router: the helper has been patched as of 1.6.4
  • @clerk/remix: the helper has been patched as of 4.8.5
  • @clerk/tanstack-react-start: the helper has been patched as of 0.18.3

Resolution

The issue was resolved in @clerk/backend 2.4.0 by:

  • Properly parsing the webhook request's signatures and comparing them against the signature generated from the received event

Workarounds

If unable to upgrade, developers can workaround this issue by verifying webhooks manually, per this documentation.

Affected Packages

9 total 9 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@clerk/backend2.0.0&&< 2.4.02.4.0npm install @clerk/backend@2.4.0
📦npm@clerk/astro2.9.0&&< 2.10.22.10.2npm install @clerk/astro@2.10.2
📦npm@clerk/express1.6.0&&< 1.7.41.7.4npm install @clerk/express@1.7.4
📦npm@clerk/fastify2.3.0&&< 2.4.42.4.4npm install @clerk/fastify@2.4.4
📦npm@clerk/nextjs6.2.10&&< 6.23.36.23.3npm install @clerk/nextjs@6.23.3
📦npm@clerk/nuxt1.7.0&&< 1.7.51.7.5npm install @clerk/nuxt@1.7.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @clerk/backend, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @clerk/backend to 2.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Applications that use the `verifyWebhook()` helper to verify incoming Clerk webhooks are susceptible to accepting improperly signed webhook events. ### Patches * `@clerk/backend`: the helper has been patched as of `2.4.0` * `@clerk/astro`: the helper has been patched as of `2.10.2` * `@clerk/express`: the helper has been patched as of `1.7.4` * `@clerk/fastify`: the helper has been patched as of `2.4.4` * `@clerk/nextjs`: the helper has been patched as of `6.23.3` * `@clerk/nuxt`: the helper has been patched as of `1.7.5` * `@clerk/react-router`: the helper has been patched as of
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-9mp4-77wg-rwx9: @clerk/backend | O3 Security