Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh

MEDIUMFix: istio/istio@692e460

GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-185 vulnerability in istio.io/istio. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Istio: AuthorizationPolicy serviceAccounts regex injection via unescaped dots

Also known asCVE-2026-39350GO-2026-5289
Published
Apr 16, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs11th percentile — riskier than 11% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.24%0.47%0.71%0.0%0.0%0.2%0.2%0.2%May 26Jul 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 356,453 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹istio.io/istio

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The serviceAccounts and notServiceAccounts fields in AuthorizationPolicy incorrectly interpret dots (.) as a regular expression matcher. Because . is a valid character in a service account name, an AuthorizationPolicy ALLOW rule targeting SA e.g. cert-manager.io also matches cert-manager-io, cert-managerXio, etc. A DENY rule targeting the same name fails to block those variants.

Patches

Fixes are available in 1.29.2, 1.28.6, and 1.27.9

Workarounds

None

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Goistio.io/istio0.0.0-20241024090207-0bf27d49ba4b&&< 0.0.0-20260403004500-692e460c342d0.0.0-20260403004500-692e460c342d

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for istio.io/istio. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update istio.io/istio to 0.0.0-20260403004500-692e460c342d or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The `serviceAccounts` and `notServiceAccounts` fields in AuthorizationPolicy incorrectly interpret dots (`.`) as a regular expression matcher. Because `.` is a valid character in a service account name, an `AuthorizationPolicy` ALLOW rule targeting SA e.g. `cert-manager.io` also matches `cert-manager-io`, `cert-managerXio`, etc. A DENY rule targeting the same name fails to block those variants. ### Patches Fixes are available in 1.29.2, 1.28.6, and 1.27.9 ### Workarounds None
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-9gcg-w975-3rjh: istio (Medium 5.4) | O3 Security