Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj

GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj is a Path Traversal vulnerability in praisonai. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

PraisonAI vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file read via MCP workflow.show, workflow.validate, deploy.validate

Also known asCVE-2026-47394PYSEC-2026-2908
Published
May 29, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 16, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs36th percentile — riskier than 36% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍praisonai

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The fix for GHSA-9mqq-jqxf-grvw / CVE-2026-44336 is incomplete. The original advisory description named four vulnerable handlers in mcp_server/adapters/cli_tools.py:

"registers four file-handling tools by default, praisonai.rules.create, praisonai.rules.show, praisonai.rules.delete, and praisonai.workflow.show. Each accepts a path or filename string from MCP tools/call arguments… with no containment check."

Commit 68cc9427 ("fix(security): harden MCP rules path handling…") added a _resolve_rule_path() helper and applied it to rules.create, rules.show, and rules.delete. workflow.show was left unchanged. Two adjacent handlers in the same file have the same pattern, workflow.validate and deploy.validate. Neither was mentioned in the original advisory. Both remain unchanged.

The original advisory also identified the dispatcher (server.py:281-298) as a root cause. It accepts unvalidated **kwargs from params["arguments"] with no enforcement against the tool's declared input_schema. That code is unchanged in HEAD as of commit 42221210.

Result: A single unauthenticated MCP tools/call to praisonai.workflow.show returns the contents of any file the host user can read: /etc/passwd, ~/.ssh/id_rsa, ~/.aws/credentials, or any project .env.

Affected functionality

src/praisonai/praisonai/mcp_server/adapters/cli_tools.py:

LinesToolBug
63-73praisonai.workflow.showReturns the full contents of any file the host user can read
42-61praisonai.workflow.validateReads any path; YAML parser error messages leak file existence + content fragments
415-432praisonai.deploy.validateSame pattern as workflow.validate. The config_path="deploy.yaml" default does not constrain the input.

src/praisonai/praisonai/mcp_server/server.py:281-298, _handle_tools_call:

async def _handle_tools_call(self, params: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    tool_name = params.get("name")
    arguments = params.get("arguments", {})
    ...
    tool = self._tool_registry.get(tool_name)
    ...
    if asyncio.iscoroutinefunction(tool.handler):
        result = await tool.handler(**arguments)        # ← no schema enforcement
    else:
        result = tool.handler(**arguments)

Any JSON arguments the MCP client sends become a **kwargs call to the handler. The original advisory pointed at this code path as the root cause. The May 3 patch did not change it.

Default deployment is exposed

src/praisonai/praisonai/mcp_server/transports/http_stream.py:38-91:

  • host defaults to 127.0.0.1, which is still reachable from any local process or container neighbour on loopback.
  • api_key defaults to None. The auth check at http_stream.py:192-198 is gated on if self.api_key:, so it is skipped when no key is configured. There is no env var or config switch that turns auth on by default.
  • The same handlers are also reachable on the stdio transport, which is the exploitation model the original advisory was written around (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue.dev, Claude Code).

Other file-read sinks reachable via the same dispatcher

These were not named in the original advisory. They confirm the bug is dispatcher-wide and not limited to cli_tools.py:

  • mcp_server/adapters/capabilities.py:19-28, praisonai.audio.transcribe(file_path). Opens any host file and ships it to OpenAI Whisper.
  • mcp_server/adapters/extended_capabilities.py:47-62, praisonai.files.create(file_path). Uploads any host file to OpenAI Files. A follow-up call to praisonai.files.content(file_id) (extended_capabilities.py:103-113) returns the bytes.
  • mcp_server/adapters/extended_capabilities.py:243-258, praisonai.ocr_extract(image_path). Opens any image, returns OCR text.

The three handlers in cli_tools.py are the most direct primitives, since they echo the file content back without an OpenAI round-trip.

Proof of Concept

Layout

PraisonAI/
└── poc/
    ├── start_mcp_server.sh         ← starts the real MCP server
    ├── run_mcp_poc_video.sh        ← runs the attack with curl
    ├── venv/                       
    └── output/
        ├── mcp_server_run.log
        ├── mcp_attacker_run.log
        └── synthetic_credentials.txt   (PoC-only fake creds)

start_mcp_server.sh run_mcp_poc_video.sh

The server starter runs the real MCPServer class with register_cli_tools(), same code path praisonai mcp serve --transport http-stream uses. No mocks.

How to reproduce

Terminal 1, start the server:

cd PraisonAI
bash poc/start_mcp_server.sh

Boots MCPServer on 127.0.0.1:8766/mcp with no auth, matching the documented default api_key=None.

Terminal 2, run the attack:

cd PraisonAI
bash poc/run_mcp_poc_video.sh

Six numbered steps. Each one prints the action, runs one curl, prints the JSON-RPC response.

workflow.validate leaks /etc/hosts:

{ "result": { "content": [{ "type": "text",
  "text": "YAML error: while scanning for the next token\nfound character '\\t' that cannot start any token\n  in \"/etc/hosts\", line 7, column 10" }] } }

The parser error message confirms the file exists and includes a fragment of its content.

deploy.validate leaks ~/.ssh/known_hosts:

{ "result": { "content": [{ "type": "text",
  "text": "Error: expected '<document start>', but found '<scalar>'\n  in \"/Users/<victim>/.ssh/known_hosts\", line 1, column 13" }] } }

workflow.show exfiltrates a credential file:

{ "result": { "content": [{ "type": "text",
  "text": "# AWS-style credentials (SYNTHETIC, for PoC only)\n[default]\naws_access_key_id = AKIA-FAKE-EXFIL-KEY-FOR-POC\naws_secret_access_key = synthetic-secret-do-not-actually-exist-12345\n\n# .env-style secrets\nDATABASE_URL=postgres://app:[email protected]/prod\nSLACK_BOT_TOKEN=xoxb-FAKE-TOKEN-for-poc-only\nOPENAI_API_KEY=sk-FAKE-FOR-POC\n" }] } }

The PoC writes its own synthetic credential file so the demonstration does not depend on the reviewer's real secrets. The same call reads ~/.ssh/id_rsa, ~/.aws/credentials, or any project .env if you point it there.

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09511e66-6a52-4fe3-a303-91d1f99cd27a

Impact

  • Confidentiality, High. Any file the praisonai user can read becomes available to the MCP caller. Typical targets are host SSH keys, cloud credentials, API tokens, project .env files, ~/.netrc, ~/.docker/config.json, browser cookie databases, and the system password file.
  • No authentication required. The default is api_key=None (http_stream.py:91). The auth check at http_stream.py:192-198 is wrapped in if self.api_key:, so it does not run when no key is configured.
  • No operator misconfiguration required. This is the documented default.
  • The original advisory's exploitation model still applies. An MCP-connected LLM whose context contains attacker-controlled web pages, documents, or emails can be steered into issuing the same tools/call and returning the response. No operator click is needed beyond "summarise this page".

The original advisory was Critical because the write primitive (rules.create) chained to RCE through .pth injection. This finding is the read half of the same shape. Read alone is enough to take SSH keys, cloud credentials, and tokens, which is usually how the rest of the host gets compromised through credential reuse.

Suggested fix

There are two ways to fix this. Doing both is fine. The dispatcher fix is preferred because it closes the same class of bug for every handler that takes a path-shaped argument, including the OpenAI-backed ones called out earlier.

1. Enforce tool.input_schema in the dispatcher

mcp_server/server.py:281-298. The schemas are already built reflectively from each handler's signature in registry.py:320-376. Validate arguments against the registered schema before calling tool.handler(**arguments) and reject anything that does not match. This covers workflow.show, workflow.validate, deploy.validate, audio.transcribe, files.create, ocr_extract, and any handler added later.

2. Per-handler containment

This is the same shape as the existing _resolve_rule_path() helper added in commit 68cc9427:

# cli_tools.py
def _resolve_workflow_path(file_path: str) -> Path:
    """Restrict workflow file_path to an allowed root."""
    if not isinstance(file_path, str) or not file_path:
        raise ValueError("file_path must be a non-empty string")
    if "\x00" in file_path or file_path.startswith("~"):
        raise ValueError(f"invalid file_path: {file_path!r}")
    workflows_root = Path(os.path.expanduser("~/.praison/workflows")).resolve()
    workflows_root.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    candidate = (workflows_root / file_path).resolve()
    try:
        candidate.relative_to(workflows_root)
    except ValueError:
        raise ValueError(f"invalid file_path: {file_path!r}")
    return candidate

Apply the same helper to:

  • workflow_show(file_path) and workflow_validate(file_path). Restrict to a workflow root.
  • deploy_validate(config_path). Restrict to a deploy-config root or an explicit allowlist.
  • The default="deploy.yaml" fallback resolves into the user's current working directory. Containment is what fixes the bug, but removing that default also makes prompt-injection chains harder.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpraisonaiall versions4.6.40

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update praisonai to 4.6.40 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The fix for GHSA-9mqq-jqxf-grvw / CVE-2026-44336 is incomplete. The original advisory description named four vulnerable handlers in `mcp_server/adapters/cli_tools.py`: > "registers four file-handling tools by default, `praisonai.rules.create`, `praisonai.rules.show`, `praisonai.rules.delete`, **and `praisonai.workflow.show`**. Each accepts a path or filename string from MCP `tools/call` arguments… **with no containment check**." Commit `68cc9427` ("fix(security): harden MCP rules path handling…") added a `_resolve_rule_path()` helper and applied it to `rules.create`, `rules.show`
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj: praisonai Remote Code… | O3 Security