ApostropheCMS import-export tar guard misses './..' because it is a literal '../' substring testGHSA-97wv-p4xx-c7mg
Fix: apostrophecms/apostrophe@9500b8bGHSA-97wv-p4xx-c7mg is a Path Traversal vulnerability in @apostrophecms/import-export. A fix is available for @apostrophecms/import-export — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-97wv-p4xx-c7mg.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@apostrophecms/import-exportnpmDescription
Summary
The tar-extraction guard added to @apostrophecms/import-export for GHSA-mwxc-m426-3f78 is a literal substring test for ../, and ./.. does not contain that substring. An entry named ./.. therefore passes the guard, path.join normalizes it to the parent of the export directory, and the resulting fs.WriteStream opens a directory and emits EISDIR with no error listener attached, which terminates the Node process.
Confirmed on default-branch HEAD 1bd5d0a7a6fe880836fa75adad6964f1c577d640, package version 3.6.2.
Details
packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js, in the tar-stream entry handler inside extract(filepath, exportPath):
const name = header.name.replace(/\\/g, '/');
if (name.includes('../')) {
// skipped
}
...
stream.pipe(fs.WriteStream(path.join(exportPath, name)));
Two separate problems sit in those four lines. The guard tests the raw entry name for a substring instead of resolving the joined path and requiring containment, and the write stream has no error handler, so any stream error becomes an unhandled 'error' event.
Reaching it needs an account that can import, nothing more. packages/import-export/modules/@apostrophecms/import-export-page/index.js exposes post.importExportImport, which calls into lib/methods/import.js; that handler requires req.user and then calls format.input(exportPath), which for a .gz upload is gzip.js calling extract() on the uploaded archive.
PoC
This is not an end-to-end exploit. What follows is each of the three primitives the crash depends on, executed individually, plus a source-level trace of the route. The chain from post.importExportImport to extract() was read, not observed.
The guard misses the payload:
node -e "console.log('./..'.includes('../')); console.log('..'.includes('../')); console.log('a/./..'.includes('../'));"
false
false
false
path.join then resolves it out of the export directory:
node -e "const path=require('path'); const exportPath='/tmp/exportRoot'; console.log(path.join(exportPath,'./..'));"
/tmp
And a write stream opened on a directory, with no error listener, kills the process rather than failing the request:
node -e "const fs=require('fs'); const s=fs.createWriteStream('/tmp'); s.write('x'); s.end(); setTimeout(()=>console.log('still alive'),500);"
events.js:291
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, open '/tmp'
Emitted 'error' event on WriteStream instance at:
at internal/fs/streams.js:361:12
at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (fs.js:156:23) {
errno: -21,
code: 'EISDIR',
syscall: 'open',
path: '/tmp'
}
The events.js:291 frame shows that transcript came off the Node 14 line my audit box had. The unhandled-error-event behavior is not version specific, but the exact message on your supported Node versions is worth a re-run.
Source-side confirmation without running anything:
grep -n "includes('../')" packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js
grep -n "WriteStream" packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js
Impact
An authenticated user who can reach the import UI uploads one crafted archive and takes down the Node process handling it. Every worker that picks up such an archive dies the same way.
Suggested fix
Resolve the target and require containment, and attach an error handler:
const base = path.resolve(exportPath);
const target = path.resolve(path.join(exportPath, name));
if (target !== base && !target.startsWith(base + path.sep)) {
stream.on('end', next);
stream.resume();
return;
}
if (header.type === 'directory') {
fsp.mkdir(target).then(next).catch(reject);
} else {
const out = fs.WriteStream(target);
out.on('error', reject);
stream.pipe(out);
stream.on('end', next);
}
The error handler earns its place independently. Any tar entry that lands on an existing directory name has the same effect whether or not traversal is involved.
Why this is not GHSA-mwxc-m426-3f78
The name.includes('../') check is the mitigation shipped for GHSA-mwxc-m426-3f78 / CVE-2026-32731. It stops names carrying the literal ../ sequence. It does not canonicalize the joined path, so ./.. and a bare .. still get through, and it did not touch the missing error listener. This report is about what the substring test leaves behind.
AI assistance was used for the code audit and drafting. The exact guard and WriteStream lines in packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js at the stated HEAD were manually verified, the import route from the page module through lib/methods/import.js into the entry handler were manually traced, and the three Node one-liners were manually ran and copied verbatim.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @apostrophecms/import-export | all versions | 3.7.0npm install @apostrophecms/import-export@3.7.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @apostrophecms/import-export, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @apostrophecms/import-export to 3.7.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-97wv-p4xx-c7mg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-97wv-p4xx-c7mg in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.