Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq nuxt

HIGHFix: nuxt/nuxt@5b60017

GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-74 vulnerability in nuxt. A fix is available for nuxt — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Nuxt: Server-Side Remote Code Execution via Runtime Template Injection in Nuxt Server Island Props

Also known asCVE-2026-71320
Published
Aug 5, 2026
Updated
Aug 5, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs38th percentile — riskier than 38% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

775other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
nuxtnpm
1.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

Nuxt server islands accept props via the /__nuxt_island/ endpoint. When vue.runtimeCompiler: true is enabled (off by default) and the application has a server island component that forwards props into Vue's dynamic component resolution (<component :is>, resolveDynamicComponent, or h()), an attacker can inject a template key into the island props to achieve server-side remote code execution in the Nitro process.

{ "as": { "template": "<attacker-controlled>" } }

Vue's runtime template compiler compiles and executes the attacker-controlled template in the server process. The same primitive also works on the client side when the runtime compiler is active there, though the server-side path is the primary concern.

Some component libraries expose a polymorphic as / asChild prop that forwards its value into <component :is>; @nuxt/ui (via reka-ui) is a widely used example. An application is affected if such a component receives the attacker-controlled value, provided vue.runtimeCompiler is also enabled. Note this does not require the island author to explicitly forward a prop: island props that the island component does not declare fall through as attributes onto its single root element (standard Vue attribute inheritance), so an island whose root is a polymorphic component receives the attacker's as value implicitly. These libraries are not themselves vulnerable; they are noted only because they commonly provide the dynamic-component sink.

Common configurations that satisfy the preconditions

The flaw is in Nuxt core. The library below is not itself vulnerable; it is noted because it commonly provides the dynamic-component sink an application might inadvertently expose.

  • @nuxt/ui (via its underlying reka-ui primitives) exposes a polymorphic as / asChild prop that is forwarded into Vue's dynamic-component resolution. Installing @nuxt/ui does not by itself register any component as a server island. Exploitation requires the application to define an island component (a .server.vue file) whose rendered output puts the attacker-controlled value on such a component's as / asChild prop; with vue.runtimeCompiler: true, the attacker-controlled template is then compiled and executed. Because undeclared island props fall through as attributes to the single root, this can happen without any explicit binding: an island whose root is a reka-ui / @nuxt/ui component is enough. An example vulnerable island (the as value falls through to UButton, no explicit forwarding needed):

    <!-- components/MyWidget.server.vue -->
    <template>
      <UButton>Save</UButton>
    </template>
    

The island URL hash (/__nuxt_island/<Name>_<hash>.json) is a deterministic (unsalted) content hash, not an authentication token. It provides integrity relative to the URL but is not a security boundary: an attacker who knows the component name and desired props can compute a valid hash.

Mitigating factors

  • vue.runtimeCompiler is off by default in Nuxt. The vast majority of Nuxt applications are not affected.
  • Exploitation requires a second precondition: the application must have a server island component that puts an attacker-controlled value onto a dynamic-component path (<component :is>, resolveDynamicComponent, h(), or a polymorphic as / asChild prop). This can occur explicitly or via attribute fallthrough when the island's root is such a component.
  • SSG / static deployments are largely unreachable via this vector (no server process to exploit).
  • Island component names are constrained to the build-time component registry; an attacker cannot resolve arbitrary components.

Affected versions

Nuxt >=3.4.0 <3.21.10 and >=4.0.0 <4.5.1, and only when vue.runtimeCompiler: true and component islands are active. Earlier versions did not allow the Vue compiler to be enabled in the server bundle (the compiler dependencies have been mock-aliased on the server since v3.0.0-rc.1), so the runtime-compilation path is not reachable. Nuxt 2 is not affected (no server islands).

Patches

When vue.runtimeCompiler is enabled, island requests whose decoded props contain a template key at any depth are rejected with an HTTP 400 and a diagnostic suggesting the author rename the prop or disable the runtime compiler. The guard is gated on the runtime compiler being enabled, so the default configuration (compiler off) is unaffected and legitimate props that merely contain a template field (for example CMS content) continue to render. A render key is not rejected: island props arrive as JSON, so a render value can only be an inert string, which Vue ignores.

Fixed in [email protected] and backported to [email protected].

Workarounds

Upgrade to [email protected] or [email protected]. If you cannot immediately upgrade, you can mitigate by:

  1. Ensure vue.runtimeCompiler is set to false (the default).
  2. Do not forward island props into <component :is>, resolveDynamicComponent, or h() without sanitization.
  3. As a defense-in-depth measure, deploy a WAF rule on /__nuxt_island/ that URL-decodes and JSON-parses the props value and blocks any object property named template or render in the decoded island props, inspecting both query and body for all methods. Note: this only covers direct and browser-originated island requests; initial-SSR internal island renders do not transit the edge and a WAF alone does not close the vector.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmnuxt4.0.0&&< 4.5.14.5.1npm install nuxt@4.5.1
📦npmnuxt3.4.0&&< 3.21.103.21.10npm install nuxt@3.21.10

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nuxt, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update nuxt to 4.5.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Impact Nuxt server islands accept props via the `/__nuxt_island/` endpoint. When `vue.runtimeCompiler: true` is enabled (off by default) and the application has a server island component that forwards props into Vue's dynamic component resolution (`<component :is>`, `resolveDynamicComponent`, or `h()`), an attacker can inject a `template` key into the island props to achieve server-side remote code execution in the Nitro process. ```json { "as": { "template": "<attacker-controlled>" } } ``` Vue's runtime template compiler compiles and executes the attacker-controlled `template` in the se
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-9473-5f9j-94wq: nuxt RCE (High 8.1) | O3 Security