Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx — unopim/unopim

HIGHFix: unopim/unopim@c14eebe

GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-284 vulnerability in unopim/unopim. A fix is available for unopim/unopim — see the affected versions and patch details below.

UnoPim has Broken Access Control

Also known asCVE-2025-55741
Published
Aug 22, 2025
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs36th percentile — riskier than 36% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘unopim/unopim

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

In Unopim, it is possible to create roles and choose the privileges. However, users without the “Delete” privilege for Products cannot delete a single product via the standard endpoint (expected behavior), but can still delete products via the mass-delete endpoint, even when the request contains only one product ID.

Severity: High CVSS Score 8.1 (CVSS 3.1 Vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H) Category: Broken Access Control / Missing Authorization (OWASP A01:2021) Impact: Unauthorized product deletion -> data loss, possible business disruption

Affected Behavior

Single delete (enforced): DELETE /admin/catalog/products/{id} returns 401 with "This action is unauthorized" for users lacking the Delete privilege.

Mass delete (not enforced): POST /admin/catalog/products/mass-delete allows deletion without the Delete privilege. This occurs for both multiple IDs and a single ID submitted to the bulk endpoint.

PoC

A video was captured in Burp Suite for a proof of concept. The cookies were used directly from Burp Suite and rendered the My Account page to prove what cookies belong to what users. The video PoC is listed in references.

Impact

Unauthorized product deletion -> data loss, possible business disruption

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistunopim/unopimall versions0.3.1composer require unopim/unopim:^0.3.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for unopim/unopim, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update unopim/unopim to 0.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In Unopim, it is possible to create roles and choose the privileges. However, users without the “Delete” privilege for Products cannot delete a single product via the standard endpoint (expected behavior), but can still delete products via the mass-delete endpoint, even when the request contains only one product ID. **Severity**: High CVSS Score 8.1 (CVSS 3.1 Vector: [AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator?vector=AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H&version=3.1)) **Category**: Broken Access Control / Missing Authorization (OWASP A0
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-8p2f-fx4q-75cx: unopim/unopim | O3 Security