How severe is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm affects the following packages: openclaw (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

Update openclaw to 2026.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.3%, placing it in the 28th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is classified as Information Exposure (CWE-200). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm was published on February 17, 2026 and was last updated on February 20, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦 npm

Not in CISA KEV

OpenClaw skills.status could leak secrets to operator.read clientsGHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm

Fix: openclaw/openclaw@d342805

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is a Information Exposure vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-26326

Published

Feb 17, 2026

Updated

Feb 20, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Nov 4, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk-0.05%

Lower risk than most CVEs28th percentile — riskier than 28% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream

openclawnpm

2.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

skills.status could disclose secrets to operator.read clients by returning raw resolved config values in configChecks for skill requires.config paths.

Affected Packages / Versions

Package: openclaw (npm)
Affected: <= 2026.2.13
Patched: 2026.2.14

Details

The gateway method skills.status returned a requirements report that included configChecks[].value (the resolved value for each requires.config entry). If a skill required a broad config subtree (for example channels.discord), the report could include secrets such as Discord bot tokens.

skills.status is callable with operator.read, so read-scoped clients could obtain secrets without operator.admin / config.* access.

Fix

Stop including raw resolved config values in requirement checks (return only { path, satisfied }).
Narrow the Discord skill requirement to the token key.

Fix commit(s):

d3428053d95eefbe10ecf04f92218ffcba55ae5a
ebc68861a61067fc37f9298bded3eec9de0ba783

Mitigation

Rotate any Discord tokens that may have been exposed to read-scoped clients.

Thanks @simecek for reporting.

Fix commits d3428053d95eefbe10ecf04f92218ffcba55ae5a and ebc68861a61067fc37f9298bded3eec9de0ba783 confirmed on main and in v2026.2.14. Upgrade to openclaw >= 2026.2.14.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`openclaw`	all versions	2026.2.14`npm install openclaw@2026.2.14`

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations

Application

openclawopenclaw

< 2026.2.14

range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update openclaw to 2026.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `skills.status` could disclose secrets to `operator.read` clients by returning raw resolved config values in `configChecks` for skill `requires.config` paths. ### Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected: `<= 2026.2.13` - Patched: `2026.2.14` ### Details The gateway method `skills.status` returned a requirements report that included `configChecks[].value` (the resolved value for each `requires.config` entry). If a skill required a broad config subtree (for example `channels.discord`), the report could include secrets such as Discord bot tokens. `ski

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works