How severe is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm affects the following packages: openclaw (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

Update openclaw to 2026.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.3%, placing it in the 22th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is classified as Information Exposure (CWE-200). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm was published on February 17, 2026 and was last updated on February 20, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦 npm

GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm

OpenClaw skills.status could leak secrets to operator.read clients

Also known asCVE-2026-26326

Published

Feb 17, 2026

Updated

Feb 20, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk22th percentile+0.29%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

openclawnpm

4.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

skills.status could disclose secrets to operator.read clients by returning raw resolved config values in configChecks for skill requires.config paths.

Affected Packages / Versions

Package: openclaw (npm)
Affected: <= 2026.2.13
Patched: 2026.2.14

Details

The gateway method skills.status returned a requirements report that included configChecks[].value (the resolved value for each requires.config entry). If a skill required a broad config subtree (for example channels.discord), the report could include secrets such as Discord bot tokens.

skills.status is callable with operator.read, so read-scoped clients could obtain secrets without operator.admin / config.* access.

Fix

Stop including raw resolved config values in requirement checks (return only { path, satisfied }).
Narrow the Discord skill requirement to the token key.

Fix commit(s):

d3428053d95eefbe10ecf04f92218ffcba55ae5a
ebc68861a61067fc37f9298bded3eec9de0ba783

Mitigation

Rotate any Discord tokens that may have been exposed to read-scoped clients.

Thanks @simecek for reporting.

Fix commits d3428053d95eefbe10ecf04f92218ffcba55ae5a and ebc68861a61067fc37f9298bded3eec9de0ba783 confirmed on main and in v2026.2.14. Upgrade to openclaw >= 2026.2.14.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`openclaw`	all versions	2026.2.14

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update openclaw to 2026.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `skills.status` could disclose secrets to `operator.read` clients by returning raw resolved config values in `configChecks` for skill `requires.config` paths. ### Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected: `<= 2026.2.13` - Patched: `2026.2.14` ### Details The gateway method `skills.status` returned a requirements report that included `configChecks[].value` (the resolved value for each `requires.config` entry). If a skill required a broad config subtree (for example `channels.discord`), the report could include secrets such as Discord bot tokens. `ski

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-8mh7-phf8-xgfm across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works