NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Vite's `server.fs.deny` did not deny requests for patterns with directoriesGHSA-8jhw-289h-jh2g

MEDIUMFix: vitejs/vite@011bbca

GHSA-8jhw-289h-jh2g is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) Information Exposure vulnerability in vite. A fix is available for vite — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2024-31207
Published
Updated
Affected
6 pkgs
Patched
6 / 6
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8jhw-289h-jh2g.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs54th percentile — riskier than 54% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.40%0.81%1.21%0.2%0.7%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

6 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

7Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
vitenpm
257.8Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

Vite dev server option server.fs.deny did not deny requests for patterns with directories. An example of such a pattern is /foo/**/*.

Impact

Only apps setting a custom server.fs.deny that includes a pattern with directories, and explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) are affected.

Patches

Fixed in [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Details

server.fs.deny uses picomatch with the config of { matchBase: true }. matchBase only matches the basename of the file, not the path due to a bug (https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/issues/89). The vite config docs read like you should be able to set fs.deny to glob with picomatch. Vite also does not set { dot: true } and that causes dotfiles not to be denied unless they are explicitly defined.

Reproduction

Set fs.deny to ['**/.git/**'] and then curl for /.git/config.

  • with matchBase: true, you can get any file under .git/ (config, HEAD, etc).
  • with matchBase: false, you cannot get any file under .git/ (config, HEAD, etc).

Affected Packages

6 total 6 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmvite≥ 2.7.0&&< 2.9.182.9.18npm install vite@2.9.18
📦npmvite≥ 3.0.0&&< 3.2.103.2.10npm install vite@3.2.10
📦npmvite≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.5.34.5.3npm install vite@4.5.3
📦npmvite≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.0.135.0.13npm install vite@5.0.13
📦npmvite≥ 5.1.0&&< 5.1.75.1.7npm install vite@5.1.7
📦npmvite≥ 5.2.0&&< 5.2.65.2.6npm install vite@5.2.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vite, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vite to 2.9.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8jhw-289h-jh2g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

This issue is considered of moderate severity due to its potential to expose sensitive files or directories under specific conditions. The vulnerability arises when a custom server.fs.deny pattern including directories, such as /foo/**/*, fails to block access as intended. This flaw can only be exploited if the Vite…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-8jhw-289h-jh2g (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary [Vite dev server option](https://vitejs.dev/config/server-options.html#server-fs-deny) `server.fs.deny` did not deny requests for patterns with directories. An example of such a pattern is `/foo/**/*`. ### Impact Only apps setting a custom `server.fs.deny` that includes a pattern with directories, and explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using `--host` or [`server.host` config option](https://vitejs.dev/config/server-options.html#server-host)) are affected. ### Patches Fixed in [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ### Detai
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8jhw-289h-jh2g in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Vite's `server.fs.deny` did not deny requests for patterns…