ex_aws_sns: Trusted-attacker `SigningCertURL` permits complete SNS signature bypassGHSA-8jgf-23q5-x7xx
Fix: ex-aws/ex_aws_sns@1853d28GHSA-8jgf-23q5-x7xx is a CWE-295 vulnerability in ex_aws_sns. A fix is available for ex_aws_sns — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8jgf-23q5-x7xx.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
ex_aws_snsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Hex packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
ExAws.SNS.verify_message/1 fetches the signing certificate from the SigningCertURL field of the incoming SNS message without validating that the URL uses HTTPS or that its host is an AWS-owned SNS certificate domain. An unauthenticated attacker who can POST to any endpoint that calls verify_message/1 can supply an attacker-controlled SigningCertURL, sign a forged SNS message with their own RSA key, and cause the function to return :ok, completely bypassing SNS signature verification.
Details
In lib/ex_aws/sns.ex (lines 475–483), verify_message/1 performs three checks: validate_message_params/1 (confirms required fields are present), validate_signature_version/1 (confirms SignatureVersion == "1"), then signature verification. The signature step calls ExAws.SNS.PublicKeyCache.get(message["SigningCertURL"]) and passes the result to :public_key.verify/4.
Neither validate_message_params/1 nor any other step checks that SigningCertURL is an HTTPS URL or that the hostname matches the expected pattern (e.g. sns.<region>.amazonaws.com). PublicKeyCache.get/1 in lib/ex_aws/sns/public_key_cache.ex fetches whatever URL is provided and caches the certificate. The RSA signature then verifies against the attacker's own public key, and verify_message/1 returns :ok.
PoC
- Generate an RSA keypair and host the DER/PEM public certificate at any URL reachable from the target server (e.g.
http://attacker.example/cert.pem). - Build a forged
Notificationpayload with an arbitraryTopicArnandMessage, compute the canonical string-to-sign per the SNS spec, and sign it with the attacker private key. - Set
SigningCertURLto the attacker URL andSignatureto the base64-encoded signature. - POST the forged payload to any SNS webhook endpoint that calls
ExAws.SNS.verify_message/1. - The function returns
:ok; the application treats the message as authentic.
Configurations
The application must expose an HTTP endpoint that calls ExAws.SNS.verify_message/1 on incoming request bodies (the standard SNS webhook pattern).
Impact
Complete SNS signature authentication bypass. Affects ex_aws_sns from 2.0.1 through 2.3.4. Consequences include spoofing arbitrary Notification payloads, auto-confirming attacker-controlled SubscribeURL values to hijack topic delivery, and spoofing UnsubscribeConfirmation to disrupt legitimate subscriptions. No authentication or special configuration on the attacker side is required. CVSS v4.0: 8.7 (HIGH).
Resources
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Hex | ex_aws_sns | ≥ 2.0.1&&< 2.3.5 | 2.3.5mix deps.update ex_aws_sns |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ex_aws_sns, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ex_aws_sns to 2.3.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8jgf-23q5-x7xx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-8jgf-23q5-x7xx in your dependencies?
Find it across Hex, including transitive dependencies.